[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: Fwd: Requesting freeze exception for JtG
From:       Pau Garcia i Quiles <pgquiles () elpauer ! org>
Date:       2011-11-24 14:04:32
Message-ID: CAKcBokvgmD63Z4p4bQ01xa5Ms2CZeT_-PzHLzkXSFwb8=JL7cw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Sebastian K=FCgler <sebas@kde.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 00:07:55 Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>> I'm a Debian developer myself and part of the Qt-KDE packaging team. I
>> know the implications of code in packaging. This patch has absolutely
>> zero implications.
>
> He was referring to "make it a standalone library and add it as dependenc=
y".

I'll repeat my question: how does that change anything? We'd be making
the implementation of this more convoluted just for the sake of
working around a non-technical problem. I can't see the point.


> Note that even this case should not change anything WRT packaging, since =
we
> promised to re-assemble tarballs for packagers.
>
> I personally don't mind a non-intrusive patch (one that just changes the =
text
> in there, for example), if the translation and docs team is OK with that.=
 This
> does not constitute a new feature to me.

Sorry but I don't understand. What text do you want to change and
where is "in there"?


> I'd suggest dropping everything in this patch that isn't strictly necessa=
ry.

Could you point me to the bits that you think aren't strictly
necessary? Because I don't see any. But maybe it's my not
understanding what Allen and you mean.


-- =

Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]