[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] Re: KDEPIM 4.6RC2 Tarballs (try #1)
From:       Vishesh Handa <handa.vish () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-06-02 5:48:26
Message-ID: BANLkTikkLkWrxHp1tn4rqpeZxO55iQPPpQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Stephen Kelly <steveire@gmail.com> wrote:

> Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> > On Monday, May 30, 2011 10:32:57 AM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> >> CC'ing release-team and kde-pim back. The people who can properly answer
> >> these concerns are not subscribed to kde-packager.
> >>
> >> Raymond Wooninck <tittiatcoke@gmail.com> writes:
> >> > On Monday 30 May 2011 09:40:46 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >> >> On Monday, May 30, 2011 09:35:54 AM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> >> >> > CC'ing kde-packager.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Stephen Kelly <steveire@gmail.com> writes:
> >> >> > > Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> >> >> > >> Speaking of SDO, last time I asked about the right version to
> use
> >> >> > >> I saw the issue was discussed on kde-core-devel and kde-pim, but
> >> >> > >> no definitive answer was given to kde-packager. Could you please
> >> >> > >> summarize the final answer for us?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > As far as I know, the rcgen code generator in kdelibs master has
> >> >> > > been
> >> >> > > changed to generate code that does not break kdepim < 4.7, even
> >> >> > > after the changes introduced in SDO 0.7.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > I didn't try it myself since then.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > OK, so KDE SC 4.7 will require SDO 0.7, but will work fine with
> >> >> > kdepim <= 4.7; KDE SC < 4.7 requires SDO 0.6, which also works fine
> >> >> > with kdepim <= 4.7?
> >> >>
> >> >> I hope kdepim 4.6 and kdelibs 4.7 both work with SDO 0.6 or 0.7 (pick
> >> >> one) as we can't use one version for some packages and another for
> >> >> others.
> >> >
> >> > What I know from Trueg is that kdelibs 4.7 has a hard requirement for
> >> > SDO
> >> > 0.7. This due to recent changes in kdelibs 4.7.  I know that kdepim in
> >> > master has been changed to work with SDO 0.7, but I am not sure if
> >> > these changes ar backwards compatible.
> >> >
> >> > So I am afraid that kdepim 4.6 and kdelibs 4.7 are currently a NO-GO
> >> > combination. (unless kdepim 4.6 has been changed to work with SDO
> 0.7).
> >>
> >> From what I see, rcgen in kdelibs master (upcoming 4.7) has been patched
> >> so that kdepim < 4.7 also works with it, so it's not a NO-GO.
> >
> > I guess the question is has it (kdelibs) been changed to work with SDO
> > 0.6? If both work with SDO 0.6, then we can stay with that until we get a
> > SDO 0.7 compatible kdepim release.
>
> 2e1704ddfda6ae53ec2793129f2700601ac6f31b in kdelibs increases the
> requirement there to SDO 0.7. I don't know why. Sebastian Trueg would have
> to answer that and tell you what it would take to revert.
>
> As far as I know, kdepim 4.6 and kdepim 4.7 are SDO 0.7 compatible. Has
> anyone confirmed the opposite? If both are not 0.7 compatible then that has
> to be fixed and nobody knows about it.
>
>
I haven't tested it but AFAIK 4.6 should NOT be compatible with SDO 0.7. If
no one
objects I can backport the fix to kdelibs 4.6.

Let me know

-- 
Vishesh Handa

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Stephen Kelly <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:steveire@gmail.com">steveire@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> <div><div></div><div class="h5">Scott Kitterman \
wrote:<br> <br>
&gt; On Monday, May 30, 2011 10:32:57 AM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; CC&#39;ing release-team and kde-pim back. The people who can properly \
answer<br> &gt;&gt; these concerns are not subscribed to kde-packager.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Raymond Wooninck &lt;<a \
href="mailto:tittiatcoke@gmail.com">tittiatcoke@gmail.com</a>&gt; writes:<br> \
&gt;&gt; &gt; On Monday 30 May 2011 09:40:46 Scott Kitterman wrote:<br> &gt;&gt; \
&gt;&gt; On Monday, May 30, 2011 09:35:54 AM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:<br> \
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; CC&#39;ing kde-packager.<br> &gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; Stephen Kelly &lt;<a \
href="mailto:steveire@gmail.com">steveire@gmail.com</a>&gt; writes:<br> &gt;&gt; \
&gt;&gt; &gt; &gt; Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:<br> &gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt;&gt; \
Speaking of SDO, last time I asked about the right version to use<br> &gt;&gt; \
&gt;&gt; &gt; &gt;&gt; I saw the issue was discussed on kde-core-devel and kde-pim, \
but<br> &gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt;&gt; no definitive answer was given to \
kde-packager. Could you please<br> &gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt;&gt; summarize the \
final answer for us?<br> &gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt; As far as I know, the rcgen code generator in kdelibs \
master has<br> &gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt; been<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt; changed to generate code that does not break kdepim &lt; \
4.7, even<br> &gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt; after the changes introduced in SDO \
0.7.<br> &gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt; I didn&#39;t try it myself since then.<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; OK, so KDE SC 4.7 will require SDO 0.7, but will work fine \
with<br> &gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; kdepim &lt;= 4.7; KDE SC &lt; 4.7 requires SDO 0.6, \
which also works fine<br> &gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; with kdepim &lt;= 4.7?<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; I hope kdepim 4.6 and kdelibs 4.7 both work with SDO 0.6 or 0.7 \
(pick<br> &gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; one) as we can&#39;t use one version for some packages \
and another for<br> &gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; others.<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt; What I know from Trueg is that kdelibs 4.7 has a hard requirement \
for<br> &gt;&gt; &gt; SDO<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt; 0.7. This due to recent changes in kdelibs 4.7.  I know that kdepim \
in<br> &gt;&gt; &gt; master has been changed to work with SDO 0.7, but I am not sure \
if<br> &gt;&gt; &gt; these changes ar backwards compatible.<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt; So I am afraid that kdepim 4.6 and kdelibs 4.7 are currently a \
NO-GO<br> &gt;&gt; &gt; combination. (unless kdepim 4.6 has been changed to work with \
SDO 0.7).<br> &gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; From what I see, rcgen in kdelibs master (upcoming 4.7) has been patched<br>
&gt;&gt; so that kdepim &lt; 4.7 also works with it, so it&#39;s not a NO-GO.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I guess the question is has it (kdelibs) been changed to work with SDO<br>
&gt; 0.6? If both work with SDO 0.6, then we can stay with that until we get a<br>
&gt; SDO 0.7 compatible kdepim release.<br>
<br>
</div></div>2e1704ddfda6ae53ec2793129f2700601ac6f31b in kdelibs increases the<br>
requirement there to SDO 0.7. I don&#39;t know why. Sebastian Trueg would have<br>
to answer that and tell you what it would take to revert.<br>
<br>
As far as I know, kdepim 4.6 and kdepim 4.7 are SDO 0.7 compatible. Has<br>
anyone confirmed the opposite? If both are not 0.7 compatible then that has<br>
to be fixed and nobody knows about it.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I \
haven&#39;t tested it but AFAIK 4.6 should NOT be compatible with SDO 0.7. If no one \
</div><div>objects I can backport the fix to kdelibs 4.6.</div> \
<div><br></div><div>Let me know</div></div><br>-- <br><font color="#999999">Vishesh \
Handa</font><br>



_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic