[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: Kate App/Part/KWrite => kate.git
From:       Christoph Cullmann <cullmann () absint ! de>
Date:       2011-01-29 14:36:31
Message-ID: 201101291536.31606.cullmann () absint ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 29 January 2011 15:06:32 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > And I don't see this as a special wish, given for example kdesdk will for
> > sure split anyway up, why is it a problem if kate splits out first? How
> > will other split modules be handled? I have no problem if kate stays in
> > the "kdesdk" group, if there is any or any other toplevel group. I not
> > insist on some toplevel "kate whatever" thing, just a place where the
> > kate.git can be and be packaged with the KDE release.
> 
> Ok, misunderstanding from my side then, having kate.git inside extragear-
> devtools or maybe kde-runtime (since it provides kwrite and katepart that
> for  me are "basics" especially katepart) totally works for me (and my
> l10n concern is vanished)
:) Where would I need to move the doc/(kwrite kate) folders in the kate.git 
layout to have that working? Atm they are still in kdesdk/base.

Greetings
Christoph
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]