I´m following the disscution from afar (Chile right now..), I havn´t commited any code for quite sometime and when I´ll come back I´ll probably concentrate on bug fixes - but I feel that the general mood is to accept the offer.

I don´t feel that I should cast a vote on this matter due to the reasons above - but why don´t the krew vote on this issue ? If most people are comfartable with the idea - we can talk about details like saving history and the right point in time to do it later, if the krew rather contiue with the current SVN - than the details are irrelevent :)

Keep up the great work (both on KDE and Krusader),
Rafi.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Sebastian Kügler <sebas@kde.org> wrote:
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 23:31:23 Jonas Bähr wrote:
> Since 2.0.0 would be our first KDE-4 release, it would be an
> acceptable point to beginn with a blank history. Sebastian, you
> mentioned "possibly losing history" as a disadvantage. Does this mean
> there is a chance to keep our history? Under which conditions? My svn
> knowledge regarding such migrations is limited, but I could only think
> of a replay of our repository. This does not really make sense....

As David said (and which might not have made it to the krusader list), it
*might* be possible to import history using svk. But you need to talk to
sysadmin@k.o about that. So I cannot be conclusive here.

> > i think it has other advantages not mentioned here (mostly from PR
> > perspective), but that aside, i would like to know which module
> > krusader would be getting into. ideally, i'd like to see krusader in
> > a package that usually gets installed by default, which (i *think*)
> > is not the situation with extragear?
>
> I think extragear would be perfectly fine, at least for the beginning.
> Some of the most popular KDE apps, like Amarok, live in extragear.
> Plus, there we have the maximum of freedom. We can't claim our
> independence on the one hand and ask for inclusion in a core module on
> the other.

Well, installed by default is ambiguous. If you're referring to kdebase, I
think that is not an option for Krusader (at least not in the current
situation). We're already shipping two filemanagers with it (while, with KDE4,
we've tried really hard to get the number of apps in the standard modules down
to one per type (i.e. one image viewer, one video player, ...). Extragear, to
*me* sounds like a sensible option indeed, but ultimately it's up to module
maintainers where Krusader can find its home.

> > what do you think guys?
>
> I'm all fo a move as soon as 2.0 is out of the door. What does the
> rest of the Krew think?

Cheers,
--
sebas

 http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org |  GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAABAgAGBQJJLTW2AAoJEGdNh9WRGQ759JcIAIb77OkZcWQTEE43CPoKh4fC
9d2s1SsDPik1r6tCdmwbtoKhyKU4JJLuh+4cVWoOyjEBu79+NENAlo3Ysudn56UV
0BEJBk0+kJauZ0e02ri7nV08+g/EP9cWKVKWMr7KwAP8bW3HRG3CTYSzcybDNUVg
1KmoDXniF7N4J52cH1T5lgShpSiWiUCnLISiZzO5M4i5z2j2sejO1P/mTUhdMHnu
G8m70kiCtZPVOHkR9eH+zMp3zi+0pNWJDxz5fnff5at+2AJ6GkyjU3JFrXRVXo4G
EwIsWBNiqYJgkU3sied04jCinmMEIyeJ0L9x+dpwNTiutMgsrWYkuASeBeFZEhI=
=wvve
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----