Will Stephenson wrote: > On Wednesday 14 May 2008 22:47:45 Allen Winter wrote: >> On Wednesday 14 May 2008 10:23:30 Matt Rogers wrote: >> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Stephen Kelly >> > wrote: >> > > On Tuesday 13 May 2008 20:54:32 you wrote: >> > >> Howdy, >> > >> >> > >> Any objection to moving KJots from kdeutils into kdepim? >> > >> >> > >> The kjots.desktop file even puts itself into the PIM Utilities >> > >> category. >> > >> >> > >> One big reason to do this is so kjots can be embedded into Kontact. >> > > >> > > I'm fine with it anyway. >> > > >> > > Steve. >> > > (KJots maintainer) >> > >> > I don't see the point of moving it. Why does KJots need to be in >> > kdepim in order to be embedded into Kontact? >> >> Because we no longer install the headers which make it >> possible to do so.  Ok.. technically you could copy the headers >> to your project dir and hack a solution.  Even still, this makes >> kdeutils dependent on kdepim (because the jots  plugin will >> require the kontact interface library). >> >> The kontact interface library API is not stable so we can't >> move it to kdepimlibs, unfortunately. >> >> This isn't a huge deal.  I almost would be happier without >> a kjots plugin, but others seem to want such a thing. > > So kjots in Kontact won't happen for 4.1 now anyway. Really? The plugin is really nearly done. KJots does load in kontact now. It just needs a little help from someone more familiar with how kontact plugins work and what needs to go into the desktop file. > During the 4.2 > release cycle, copy the (unstable) headers to kjots svn until the plugin > is done then shift the whole lot into PIM then - job done. Can't this be done as easily for KDE 4.1? I'd really like to get it in for then. > > Decide when a kjots plugin is realistic, and make an appropriate decision. > > Will > Best regards, Steve. _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team