On Monday 28 April 2008 11:41:56 Nicolas Ternisien wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Matt Rogers wrote: > > On Monday 28 April 2008 05:30:25 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 05:32:53PM +0200, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > > > * KCalc - scientific calculator > > > > > > KCalc should be replaced by speedcrunch in my opinion, but that would > > > require the speedcrunch developers to propose it rather than just say > > > they will :) > > > > I disagree with you that KCalc should be replaced. I wouldn't > > necessarily call it a scientific calculator though. > > I will personally prefer to have Speedcrunch in kdeutils, because > Speedcrunch could have the look of a standard calculator and is really > more powerful for anyone who wants to make simple computation. > > Similar looks : > http://stuff.forum-software.org/calcs/kcalc.png > and > http://stuff.forum-software.org/calcs/speedcrunch.png You can't be serious. If we try to put this sort of advanced calculator instead kcalc, my company at least will have some customer complain heavily on their 20k machines deplyed with KDE for common users.. I'm strongly against this kind of replacement. -- Helio Chissini de Castro KDE Project Brasil and South America Primary Contact _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team