--===============0801082381== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart11975764.rjOh6mMhb3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart11975764.rjOh6mMhb3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 21 April 2008 16:12:08 Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Monday 21 April 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > * if we want WoC and other necessary steps forward in plasma in a > > rational time frame (e.g. not next year), occassional blips like this > > will happen and be necessary. bitching about how it will affect an > > *alpha* release is shortsighted > > I have no pain in plasma being less than 100% functional for Alpha1, to be > exact. The only question that is relevant (besides that I hurt your > feelings again, I'm sorry really about that): does it help plasma > development to get user feedback about the current (well todays+2 days) > state of plasma or not? if you're saying "I don't want anyone to tell me > about problems" right now, then we have to evaluate a different option. if > you're saying "there are some problems but we'd still want to have some > feedback) , then we're good to go. Before the WoC merge, two people had worked on it, having it in (which real= ly=20 was a group decision at the sprint) 'elevated its priority' and more people= =20 joined in (locally at the sprint and on IRC). We got it back to something=20 that looks like a desktop pretty quickly. Although speculative, I doubt thi= s=20 would have been possible when operating from a branch. So yeah, pain, but worth it. > It is an *alpha* release afterall, the amount of feedback it will receive > will probably be fairly minimal anyway. And we have a tradition of Alpha releases of Plasma, no? ;-) =2D-=20 sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9=20 --nextPart11975764.rjOh6mMhb3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUASAyuK2dNh9WRGQ75AQKN+gf+PuvtH5R1BIehcQ1bvsIhNInfZSpodBIK 1nPE/oyya6uPIPTH/LJBHFA1RoHfDpRwuUrJXD9QL7epSlT1St9Qjbn3d2OG5vFj grZ3VejuXxK53UYzdJRRiFTv94vlCXc3tQICgsJ6LTVe63lcLg9KweF7CU09i/Zx 8kbOHu376j1crklqLiL0z6tQ+Yi6EYnb6XMsuzVmPAFdYLmv0J7U9zAsZMv3V5pq igAneW9m/MKWfHgD2sbY07+5Jzv7u5VTzFhYIUOWy5uVb6ziEGHf6Zl/+eiqqzgE qcqCv7B8ICmuOiP/HlY65+inGsPtp9kt2wMdvm0yq+L+7eHYX5Ia/A== =vbGZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart11975764.rjOh6mMhb3-- --===============0801082381== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team --===============0801082381==--