From kde-release-team Wed Apr 09 12:31:04 2008 From: Tom Albers Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:31:04 +0000 To: kde-release-team Subject: Re: Extragear tarball 4.0.3 Message-Id: <1657092.J9DnSKBtDD () kde ! nl> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-release-team&m=120774502820219 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart4030726.FkLT1EBHhS" --nextPart4030726.FkLT1EBHhS Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit At Tuesday 08 April 2008 19:24, you wrote: > On Tuesday, 08. April 2008 16:19:55 Tom Albers wrote: > > > The version number needs to change, that's a basic part of release > > > management. If it's not done by the app author it should be done by > > > the release manager or just not released at all. > > It can not be done by the release manager as that proposal from me was > > denied (see the evaluation thread on these lists a couple months back). > > In that case, it's really pretty simple and as Jonathan wrote: The stuff > shouldn't be released then. That means you will not get updated translations. > It will probably either help getting authors to do at least the most basic > (!) step of a change and release management or get your proposal > reconsidered. True. So if we consider the last release, nobody updated the version number iirc, so that would have meant that there would have been only a tarball for gopher. Is that the consensus? Anyone from the extragear applications want to comment at all, or isn't it important to you? If so, we better move on, I have other things to do then creating unwanted tarballs ;-) -- Tom Albers --nextPart4030726.FkLT1EBHhS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team --nextPart4030726.FkLT1EBHhS--