From kde-release-team  Fri Dec 07 17:46:31 2007
From: Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:46:31 +0000
To: kde-release-team
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Kde-pim] Request to exclude KMail from the KDE 4.0 release
Message-Id: <200712071846.38356.zander () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-release-team&m=119704956914023
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============1103778257=="


--===============1103778257==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="nextPart1502540.mr5gLia5dP";
	 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1


--nextPart1502540.mr5gLia5dP
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 07 December 2007 16:15:01 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Friday 07 December 2007, Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
> > On Friday 07 December 2007 00:49:08 Allen Winter wrote:
> > > Yes, KMail is really as bad as indicated in the enclosed message.
> > > And so are many of the KDEPIM apps.
> >
> > That matches what Mirko of KDAB told me. He also said that it should be
> > fine by April.
>
> "should be fine" is always a disturbing statement ;-)

Depends entirely on the track record of the person(s) making that=20
statement :)

=2D-=20
Thomas Zander

--nextPart1502540.mr5gLia5dP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHWYb+CojCW6H2z/QRAh+jAKCn3lzwkwUPE6T+ofPgNWBkt2SGGACg6co7
2CQpIxMAocPoatcfUOjBxnQ=
=VYBI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1502540.mr5gLia5dP--

--===============1103778257==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

--===============1103778257==--