[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-redhat-users
Subject: kde-redhat-users Digest, Vol 31, Issue 7
From: kde-redhat-users-request () lists ! sourceforge ! net
Date: 2008-12-12 2:38:24
Message-ID: mailman.291450.1229049504.3608.kde-redhat-users () lists ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Send kde-redhat-users mailing list submissions to
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
kde-redhat-users-owner@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of kde-redhat-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: new fedora-kde list (Steven M. Parrish)
2. Re: new fedora-kde list (Rex Dieter)
3. Re: new fedora-kde list (Colin J Thomson)
4. Re: new fedora-kde list (Rex Dieter)
5. Re: new fedora-kde list (Thomas Moschny)
6. Re: new fedora-kde list (Rex Dieter)
7. Re: f10/unstable: kde-4.1.80, deps fixed (even compiz)
(Neal Becker)
8. kde-4.1.80 akregator problem? (Neal Becker)
[Attachment #4 (multipart/digest)]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Steven M. Parrish" <smparrish@shallowcreek.net>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "General discussion for kde-redhat users"
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <49414A24.7030401@fedoraproject.org>
<bfdeacfa0812111033g4a0853c1p5dcf23fcbc57e4e9@mail.gmail.com>
<4941621E.80802@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4941621E.80802@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:06:47 -0500
Reply-To: smparrish@shallowcreek.net, General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200812111506.48598.smparrish@shallowcreek.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] new fedora-kde list
Message: 1
On Thursday 11 December 2008 13:55:26 Rex Dieter wrote:
> Mark Bidewell wrote:
> > Will existing subscribers be migrated?
>
> I considerred, but leaned toward no.
>
> I *could* though, folks, what say you? aye or nay?
>
> -- Rex
>
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> >> Alrighty, finally got off my arse to get a more official list made, as
> >> well as moving away from relying on sourceforge. Ta da,
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas,
> Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09
> to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com
>/ _______________________________________________
> kde-redhat-users mailing list
> kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
I so dont migrate
By not migrating you prune out the folks who while still subscribed no longer
have an interest in what we say. And if they can't take the 30 secs needed to
subscribe to the new list then the choice is theirs.
Steven
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <49414A24.7030401@fedoraproject.org> <bfdeacfa0812111033g4a0853c1p5dcf23fcbc57e4e9@mail.gmail.com> <4941621E.80802@math.unl.edu>
<200812112148.59639.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <200812112148.59639.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:18:50 -0600
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <494175AA.3060504@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] new fedora-kde list
Message: 2
Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> I really think we should have a space to grumble like this outside of Fedora.
What difference does it make, where the list is hosted(*)
I'm genuinely curious, because things should be open and transparent
enought that it doesn't. I'm open to the idea that perceptions may not
be close to reality here.
(*) Discounting the quality of such hosting, let's leave that out of the
discussion for now.
-- Rex
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Colin J Thomson <colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "General discussion for kde-redhat users"
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <49414A24.7030401@fedoraproject.org> <4941621E.80802@math.unl.edu>
<200812111506.48598.smparrish@shallowcreek.net>
In-Reply-To: <200812111506.48598.smparrish@shallowcreek.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:20:27 +0000
Reply-To: colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk, General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200812112020.27371.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] new fedora-kde list
Message: 3
On Thursday 11 December 2008 20:06:47 Steven M. Parrish wrote:
> I so dont migrate
>
> By not migrating you prune out the folks who while still subscribed no
> longer have an interest in what we say. And if they can't take the 30 secs
> needed to subscribe to the new list then the choice is theirs.
Yep I agree with Steven, don't migrate.
Colin
--
Fedora 10 (Cambridge)
Registered Linux user number #342953
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <49414A24.7030401@fedoraproject.org>
<4941621E.80802@math.unl.edu> <200812111506.48598.smparrish@shallowcreek.net>
<200812112020.27371.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200812112020.27371.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:24:06 -0600
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <494176E6.4030302@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] new fedora-kde list
Message: 4
Colin J Thomson wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 20:06:47 Steven M. Parrish wrote:
>
>> I so dont migrate
>>
>> By not migrating you prune out the folks who while still subscribed no
>> longer have an interest in what we say. And if they can't take the 30 secs
>> needed to subscribe to the new list then the choice is theirs.
>
> Yep I agree with Steven, don't migrate.
OK, that's enough of a veto confidence-vote for me. No it is.
-- Rex
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Thomas Moschny" <thomas.moschny@gmail.com>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "General discussion for kde-redhat users"
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <49414A24.7030401@fedoraproject.org> <4941621E.80802@math.unl.edu>
<200812111506.48598.smparrish@shallowcreek.net>
<200812112020.27371.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
<494176E6.4030302@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <494176E6.4030302@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:46:53 +0100
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <a9d183c80812111246s7ebe7877m5f064797adf1d2bc@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] new fedora-kde list
Message: 5
2008/12/11 Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>:
> OK, that's enough of a veto confidence-vote for me. No it is.
Wow that was fast. I was going to suggest a procedure I've seen for
other lists: Migrate all people half-automatically, that is, add them
tentatively so they get a confirmation mail they have to react on. If
they choose to ignore that for any reason, they will not be
subscribed.
- Thomas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <49414A24.7030401@fedoraproject.org>
<4941621E.80802@math.unl.edu> <200812111506.48598.smparrish@shallowcreek.net> <200812112020.27371.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk> <494176E6.4030302@math.unl.edu>
<a9d183c80812111246s7ebe7877m5f064797adf1d2bc@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a9d183c80812111246s7ebe7877m5f064797adf1d2bc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:14:30 -0600
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <494182B6.6020101@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] new fedora-kde list
Message: 6
Thomas Moschny wrote:
> 2008/12/11 Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>:
> > OK, that's enough of a veto confidence-vote for me. No it is.
>
> Wow that was fast. I was going to suggest a procedure I've seen for
> other lists: Migrate all people half-automatically, that is, add them
> tentatively so they get a confirmation mail they have to react on. If
> they choose to ignore that for any reason, they will not be
> subscribed.
Ah, true. auto-subscribe vs auto-invite. Purely opt-in at that point.
OK, call me mr waffle, but I like that idea. I'll probably push the
"big red button"(tm) tomorrow. Apologies in advance for the invite-spam.
-- Rex
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "General discussion for kde-redhat users"
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <493E9A4C.6080908@math.unl.edu> <493FEA55.4070703@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <493FEA55.4070703@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:20:52 -0500
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200812111920.52890.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] f10/unstable: kde-4.1.80,
deps fixed (even compiz)
Message: 7
What is suggested way to test?
yum --enablerepo=kde-unstable update 'kde*' ?
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:38:10 -0500
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200812112138.11085.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Subject: [kde-redhat-users] kde-4.1.80 akregator problem?
Message: 8
So far so good with kde-4.1.80. Had to also update akonadi.
1 problem so far. Akregator isn't showing articles. Just shows the web site
link for the site.
I'm testing this on a machine I don't normally use, so maybe there is some
other config issue (not related to 4.1.80).
--===============0943154020625724649==--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
kde-redhat-users mailing list
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic