[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-redhat-users
Subject: kde-redhat-users Digest, Vol 28, Issue 2
From: kde-redhat-users-request () lists ! sourceforge ! net
Date: 2008-09-09 16:50:29
Message-ID: mailman.589452.1220979029.10106.kde-redhat-users () lists ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Send kde-redhat-users mailing list submissions to
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
kde-redhat-users-owner@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of kde-redhat-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: KDE 4.1.1? (Rex Dieter)
2. Re: KDE 4.1.1? (Colin J Thomson)
3. Re: KDE 4.1.1? (Rex Dieter)
4. Re: KDE 4.1.1? (Colin J Thomson)
5. Re: KDE 4.1.1? (Eli Wapniarski)
6. Re: KDE 4.1.1? (Eli Wapniarski)
7. Sitting on the Chesterfield biting my Nails (kwhiskerz)
[Attachment #4 (multipart/digest)]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <167156.87972.qm@web32801.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <48C01E45.6000901@math.unl.edu>
<200809042222.39546.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <200809042222.39546.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:27:44 -0500
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <48C036B0.8060007@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] KDE 4.1.1?
Message: 1
Eli Wapniarski wrote:
>
>
> Sigh.... I understand... Time issues, but I miss kde-redhat.org.
It's less of a time issue, but I don't want to see folks using
kde-redhat as a crutch instead of using fedora's official repos which
has the same content.
I'll continue to use kde-redhat when/if it makes sense, but using it to
preemptively host fedora content isn't one of those cases, imo.
-- Rex
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Colin J Thomson <colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "General discussion for kde-redhat users"
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <167156.87972.qm@web32801.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
<200809042222.39546.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
<48C036B0.8060007@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <48C036B0.8060007@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:50:42 +0100
Reply-To: colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk, General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200809042050.42951.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] KDE 4.1.1?
Message: 2
On Thursday 04 September 2008 20:27:44 Rex Dieter wrote:
> Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > Sigh.... I understand... Time issues, but I miss kde-redhat.org.
>
> It's less of a time issue, but I don't want to see folks using
> kde-redhat as a crutch instead of using fedora's official repos which
> has the same content.
>
> I'll continue to use kde-redhat when/if it makes sense, but using it to
> preemptively host fedora content isn't one of those cases, imo.
Not sure if I missed a comment, but will kdepim4 now be from the Fedora repo's
for F9.
Colin
--
Fedora 9 (Sulphur)
Registered Linux user number #342953
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <167156.87972.qm@web32801.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200809042222.39546.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org> <48C036B0.8060007@math.unl.edu>
<200809042050.42951.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200809042050.42951.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:02:45 -0500
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <48C03EE5.8010306@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] KDE 4.1.1?
Message: 3
Colin J Thomson wrote:
> Not sure if I missed a comment, but will kdepim4 now be from the Fedora repo's
> for F9.
Repeat after me:
kdepim4 is F10+ only.
kdepim4 is F10+ only.
kdepim4 is F10+ only.
> )
That said, it will continue to be available in kde-redhat/unstable for F-9.
-- Rex
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Colin J Thomson <colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "General discussion for kde-redhat users"
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <167156.87972.qm@web32801.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
<200809042050.42951.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
<48C03EE5.8010306@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <48C03EE5.8010306@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:15:25 +0100
Reply-To: colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk, General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200809042115.25623.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] KDE 4.1.1?
Message: 4
On Thursday 04 September 2008 21:02:45 Rex Dieter wrote:
> Colin J Thomson wrote:
> > Not sure if I missed a comment, but will kdepim4 now be from the Fedora
> > repo's for F9.
>
> Repeat after me:
> kdepim4 is F10+ only.
> kdepim4 is F10+ only.
> kdepim4 is F10+ only.
>
> :)
>
> That said, it will continue to be available in kde-redhat/unstable for F-9.
Excellent :)
Colin
--
Fedora 9 (Sulphur)
Registered Linux user number #342953
[Attachment #10 (message/rfc822)]
Not using it as a crutch. kde-redhat lets me use and test the latest greatest
kde when compiled against Everything and Updates without having to use fedora-
testing on production computers. And there does seem to be some important
fixes in kde 4.1.1
Eli
> It's less of a time issue, but I don't want to see folks using
> kde-redhat as a crutch instead of using fedora's official repos which
> has the same content.
>
> I'll continue to use kde-redhat when/if it makes sense, but using it to
> preemptively host fedora content isn't one of those cases, imo.
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
[Attachment #13 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" \
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"> <html><head><meta name="qrichtext" \
content="1" /><style type="text/css"> p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
</style></head><body style=" font-family:'Monospace'; font-size:10pt; \
font-weight:400; font-style:normal;"> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">Not using it as a crutch. kde-redhat lets me use and test the \
latest greatest kde when compiled against Everything and Updates without having to \
use fedora-testing on production computers. And there does seem to be some important \
fixes in kde 4.1.1</p> <p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"></p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">Eli</p> <p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"></p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> It's less of a time \
issue, but I don't want to see folks using</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> kde-redhat as a crutch instead of using \
fedora's official repos which</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">> has the same content.</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">></p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> I'll continue to use kde-redhat when/if it \
makes sense, but using it to</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">> preemptively host fedora content isn't one of those cases, \
imo.</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; \
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">></p> <p \
style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; \
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;"></p></body><br />-- <br />This message has been scanned for \
viruses and <br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.
</html>
[Attachment #14 (message/rfc822)]
Besides, Fedora updates via yum or apt-get hasn't been updated since |"the
breach"
Eli
On Friday, 5 בSeptember 2008 07:45:58 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> Not using it as a crutch. kde-redhat lets me use and test the latest
> greatest kde when compiled against Everything and Updates without having to
> use fedora- testing on production computers. And there does seem to be some
> important fixes in kde 4.1.1
>
> Eli
>
> > It's less of a time issue, but I don't want to see folks using
> > kde-redhat as a crutch instead of using fedora's official repos which
> > has the same content.
> >
> > I'll continue to use kde-redhat when/if it makes sense, but using it to
> > preemptively host fedora content isn't one of those cases, imo.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
[Attachment #17 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" \
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"> <html><head><meta name="qrichtext" \
content="1" /><style type="text/css"> p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
</style></head><body style=" font-family:'Monospace'; font-size:10pt; \
font-weight:400; font-style:normal;"> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">Besides, Fedora updates via yum or apt-get hasn't been updated \
since |"the breach"</p> <p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"></p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">Eli</p> <p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"></p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">On Friday, 5 בSeptember 2008 \
07:45:58 Eli Wapniarski wrote:</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">> Not using it as a crutch. kde-redhat lets me use and test the \
latest</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; \
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> \
greatest kde when compiled against Everything and Updates without having to</p> <p \
style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> use fedora- testing on \
production computers. And there does seem to be some</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> important fixes in kde 4.1.1</p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">></p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> Eli</p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">></p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> > It's less of a time \
issue, but I don't want to see folks using</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> > kde-redhat as a crutch instead of using \
fedora's official repos which</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">> > has the same content.</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> ></p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> > I'll continue to use kde-redhat when/if \
it makes sense, but using it to</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">> > preemptively host fedora content isn't one of those \
cases, imo.</p> <p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"></p></body><br />-- <br />This message has been \
scanned for viruses and <br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.
</html>
[Attachment #18 (message/rfc822)]
I couldn't wait and plucked all of the packages for kde-4.1.1 from Koji. All
went great with the installation, except one hitch: there was no package for
kdepim.
Now, I know that kdepim is not going to be in fedora 9, but isn't it supposed
to be in kde-redhat for fedora 9? It isn't.
I had to force the installation (all of those 'jots' files from kdeutils-4.1.1
conflicted with those from kdepim-4.1.0), but otherwise the system is running
superbly.
Nevertheless, I am wondering, won't we get kdepim-4.1.1 (via kde-redhat)?
[Attachment #21 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" \
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"> <html><head><meta name="qrichtext" \
content="1" /><style type="text/css"> p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
</style></head><body style=" font-family:'DejaVu Sans'; font-size:10pt; \
font-weight:400; font-style:normal;"> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">I couldn't wait and plucked all of the packages for <span style=" \
font-weight:600;">kde-4.1.1</span> from Koji. All went great with the installation, \
except one hitch: there was no package for <span style=" \
font-weight:600;">kdepim</span>.</p> <p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"></p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">Now, I know that <span \
style=" font-weight:600;">kdepim</span> is not going to be in fedora 9, but isn't it \
supposed to be in kde-redhat for fedora 9? It isn't.</p> <p \
style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; \
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"></p> <p \
style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">I had to force the \
installation (all of those 'jots' files from <span style=" \
font-weight:600;">kdeutils-4.1.1</span> conflicted with those from <span style=" \
font-weight:600;">kdepim-4.1.0</span>), but otherwise the system is running \
superbly.</p> <p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;"></p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">Nevertheless, I am wondering, won't we get <span style=" \
font-weight:600;">kdepim-4.1.1</span> (via kde-redhat)?</p> <p \
style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; \
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;"></p></body></html>
--===============0744585931==--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
kde-redhat-users mailing list
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic