[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-redhat-users
Subject: kde-redhat-users Digest, Vol 27, Issue 5
From: kde-redhat-users-request () lists ! sourceforge ! net
Date: 2008-08-26 0:20:53
Message-ID: mailman.502983.1219710053.10106.kde-redhat-users () lists ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Send kde-redhat-users mailing list submissions to
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
kde-redhat-users-owner@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of kde-redhat-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: amarok betas? (Jos? Matos)
2. Re: amarok betas? (Florian Sievert)
3. Re: amarok betas? (Neal Becker)
4. Re: amarok betas? (Rex Dieter)
5. Re: amarok betas? (Rex Dieter)
6. Re: amarok betas? (Rex Dieter)
7. Re: amarok betas? (Neal Becker)
8. Re: amarok betas? (Rex Dieter)
9. Re: amarok betas? (Neal Becker)
[Attachment #4 (multipart/digest)]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?José_Matos?= <jamatos@fc.up.pt>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <200808250729.01375.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200808250729.01375.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:36:22 +0100
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200808251236.23111.jamatos@fc.up.pt>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok betas?
Message: 1
On Monday 25 August 2008 12:29:01 Neal Becker wrote:
> Are amarok betas available?
They are in unstable. I have installed it on Saturday and it feels like an
evolution from the previous alpha. :-)
--
José Abílio
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Florian Sievert <floriansievert@phobeus.de>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <200808250729.01375.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200808250729.01375.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:37:21 +0200
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <48B29971.10700@phobeus.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok betas?
Message: 2
Hi Neal,
> Are amarok betas available?
>
Amarok Beta 1 is already avaible in kde-unstable (1.90)
Best regards,
Florian
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <200808250729.01375.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
<48B29971.10700@phobeus.de>
In-Reply-To: <48B29971.10700@phobeus.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:03:29 -0400
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200808250903.30074.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok betas?
Message: 3
On Monday 25 August 2008, Florian Sievert wrote:
> Hi Neal,
>
> > Are amarok betas available?
>
> Amarok Beta 1 is already avaible in kde-unstable (1.90)
>
> Best regards,
> Florian
>
Updated: amarok.x86_64 0:1.90-1.fc9
Complete!
[nbecker@nbecker1 ~]$ amarok
amarok: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libamaroklib.so.1: undefined symbol:
_ZN16QFileSystemModel5eventEP6QEvent
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <200808250729.01375.ndbecker2@gmail.com> <48B29971.10700@phobeus.de>
<200808250903.30074.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200808250903.30074.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:13:15 -0500
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <48B2AFEB.8030107@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok betas?
Message: 4
Neal Becker wrote:
> On Monday 25 August 2008, Florian Sievert wrote:
>> Hi Neal,
>>
>>> Are amarok betas available?
>> Amarok Beta 1 is already avaible in kde-unstable (1.90)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Florian
>>
>
> Updated: amarok.x86_64 0:1.90-1.fc9
> Complete!
> [nbecker@nbecker1 ~]$ amarok
> amarok: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libamaroklib.so.1: undefined symbol:
> _ZN16QFileSystemModel5eventEP6QEvent
You need the latest qt-4.4.1 from updates-testing.
Hrm, I suppose I didn't pull that into kde-redhat/testing yet. Maybe
I'll do that. :)
-- Rex
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <200808250729.01375.ndbecker2@gmail.com> <48B29971.10700@phobeus.de>
<200808250903.30074.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
<48B2AFEB.8030107@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <48B2AFEB.8030107@math.unl.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:13:56 -0500
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <48B2B014.8050601@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok betas?
Message: 5
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> On Monday 25 August 2008, Florian Sievert wrote:
>>> Hi Neal,
>>>
>>>> Are amarok betas available?
>>> Amarok Beta 1 is already avaible in kde-unstable (1.90)
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Florian
>>>
>>
>> Updated: amarok.x86_64 0:1.90-1.fc9
>> Complete!
>> [nbecker@nbecker1 ~]$ amarok
>> amarok: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libamaroklib.so.1: undefined
>> symbol: _ZN16QFileSystemModel5eventEP6QEvent
>
> You need the latest qt-4.4.1 from updates-testing.
>
>
> Hrm, I suppose I didn't pull that into kde-redhat/testing yet. Maybe
> I'll do that. :)
Nevermind, confirmed to already be the case.
-- Rex
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <200808250729.01375.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
<48B29971.10700@phobeus.de>
<200808250903.30074.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:54:27 -0500
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <g8v2lk$3bn$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok betas?
Message: 6
Neal Becker wrote:
> On Monday 25 August 2008, Florian Sievert wrote:
>> Hi Neal,
>>
>> > Are amarok betas available?
>>
>> Amarok Beta 1 is already avaible in kde-unstable (1.90)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Florian
>>
>
> Updated: amarok.x86_64 0:1.90-1.fc9
> Complete!
> [nbecker@nbecker1 ~]$ amarok
> amarok: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libamaroklib.so.1: undefined
> symbol: _ZN16QFileSystemModel5eventEP6QEvent
I've rev'd a newer 1.90-1.fc9.1 build that tightens deps a bit, to try to
avoid this kind of thing.
-- Rex
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <200808250729.01375.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
<200808250903.30074.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
<g8v2lk$3bn$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <g8v2lk$3bn$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:22:24 -0400
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200808251922.25111.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok betas?
Message: 7
On Monday 25 August 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
> > On Monday 25 August 2008, Florian Sievert wrote:
> > > Hi Neal,
> > >
> > > > Are amarok betas available?
> > >
> > > Amarok Beta 1 is already avaible in kde-unstable (1.90)
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Florian
> >
> > Updated: amarok.x86_64 0:1.90-1.fc9
> > Complete!
> > [nbecker@nbecker1 ~]$ amarok
> > amarok: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libamaroklib.so.1: undefined
> > symbol: _ZN16QFileSystemModel5eventEP6QEvent
>
> I've rev'd a newer 1.90-1.fc9.1 build that tightens deps a bit, to try to
> avoid this kind of thing.
>
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/qt4/translations/assistant_de.qm from install of
qt-4.4.1-2.fc9.x86_64 conflicts with file from package qt-4.3.5-2.fc9.i386 \
file /usr/share/qt4/translations/assistant_pl.qm from install of
qt-4.4.1-2.fc9.x86_64 conflicts with file from package qt-4.3.5-2.fc9.i386 \
... lots more
Seems we need qt-4.4.1.i386 also.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <200808250729.01375.ndbecker2@gmail.com> <200808250903.30074.ndbecker2@gmail.com> <g8v2lk$3bn$1@ger.gmane.org>
<200808251922.25111.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200808251922.25111.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:01:53 -0500
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <48B347F1.3040300@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok betas?
Message: 8
Neal Becker wrote:
> On Monday 25 August 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Neal Becker wrote:
> > > On Monday 25 August 2008, Florian Sievert wrote:
> > > > Hi Neal,
> > > >
> > > > > Are amarok betas available?
> > > > Amarok Beta 1 is already avaible in kde-unstable (1.90)
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Florian
> > > Updated: amarok.x86_64 0:1.90-1.fc9
> > > Complete!
> > > [nbecker@nbecker1 ~]$ amarok
> > > amarok: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libamaroklib.so.1: undefined
> > > symbol: _ZN16QFileSystemModel5eventEP6QEvent
> > I've rev'd a newer 1.90-1.fc9.1 build that tightens deps a bit, to try to
> > avoid this kind of thing.
> >
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/share/qt4/translations/assistant_de.qm from install of
> qt-4.4.1-2.fc9.x86_64 conflicts with file from package qt-4.3.5-2.fc9.i386 \
> file /usr/share/qt4/translations/assistant_pl.qm from install of
> qt-4.4.1-2.fc9.x86_64 conflicts with file from package qt-4.3.5-2.fc9.i386 \
>
> ... lots more
>
> Seems we need qt-4.4.1.i386 also.
As I've mentioned before, kde-redhat repos don't do multilib. If you're
on x86_64 and want/need multilib, you need to fix it manually.
Fix by either fetching the i386 builds from i386 repo by either enabling
the i386 repo or getting them by hand.
Or... just use fedora's updates-testing repo which *is* multilib'd.
-- Rex
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <200808250729.01375.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
<200808251922.25111.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
<48B347F1.3040300@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <48B347F1.3040300@math.unl.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:20:57 -0400
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200808252020.58412.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok betas?
Message: 9
On Monday 25 August 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
> > On Monday 25 August 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> Neal Becker wrote:
> >>> On Monday 25 August 2008, Florian Sievert wrote:
> >>>> Hi Neal,
> >>>>
> >>>>> Are amarok betas available?
> >>>>
> >>>> Amarok Beta 1 is already avaible in kde-unstable (1.90)
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Florian
> >>>
> >>> Updated: amarok.x86_64 0:1.90-1.fc9
> >>> Complete!
> >>> [nbecker@nbecker1 ~]$ amarok
> >>> amarok: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libamaroklib.so.1: undefined
> >>> symbol: _ZN16QFileSystemModel5eventEP6QEvent
> >>
> >> I've rev'd a newer 1.90-1.fc9.1 build that tightens deps a bit, to try
> >> to avoid this kind of thing.
> >
> > Transaction Check Error:
> > file /usr/share/qt4/translations/assistant_de.qm from install of
> > qt-4.4.1-2.fc9.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> > qt-4.3.5-2.fc9.i386 file /usr/share/qt4/translations/assistant_pl.qm from
> > install of qt-4.4.1-2.fc9.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> > qt-4.3.5-2.fc9.i386 ... lots more
> >
> > Seems we need qt-4.4.1.i386 also.
>
> As I've mentioned before, kde-redhat repos don't do multilib. If you're
> on x86_64 and want/need multilib, you need to fix it manually.
>
> Fix by either fetching the i386 builds from i386 repo by either enabling
> the i386 repo or getting them by hand.
>
> Or... just use fedora's updates-testing repo which *is* multilib'd.
>
> -- Rex
But you can't live without qt.i386, unless you don't want any kde devel
packages:
Removing:
qt i386 1:4.3.5-2.fc9 installed 5.9 M
Removing for dependencies:
kdebase-workspace-devel x86_64 4.1.0-3.fc9 installed 3.4 M
kdebindings-devel x86_64 4.1.0-5.fc9 installed 383 k
kdeedu-devel x86_64 4.1.0-1.fc9 installed 335 k
kdegames-devel x86_64 6:4.1.0-1.fc9 installed 500 k
kdegraphics-devel x86_64 7:4.1.0-3.fc9 installed 193 k
kdelibs-devel x86_64 6:4.1.0-3.fc9 installed 6.0 M
kdemultimedia-devel x86_64 6:4.1.0-1.fc9 installed 495 k
kdenetwork-devel x86_64 7:4.1.0-2.fc9 installed 788 k
kdepim-devel x86_64 6:4.1.0-2.fc9 installed 398 k
kdepimlibs-devel x86_64 4.1.0-1.fc9 installed 1.6 M
kdesdk-devel x86_64 4.1.0-1.fc9 installed 613 k
phonon i386 4.2.0-2.fc9 installed 358 k
phonon-devel i386 4.2.0-2.fc9 installed 211 k
qt-x11 i386 1:4.3.5-2.fc9 installed 16 M
soprano i386 2.0.3-2.fc9 installed 1.5 M
strigi-libs i386 0.5.11-1.fc9 installed 1.1 M
--===============0089926727==--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
kde-redhat-users mailing list
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic