[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-redhat-users
Subject:    kde-redhat-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 5
From:       kde-redhat-users-request () lists ! sourceforge ! net
Date:       2008-07-10 22:59:00
Message-ID: mailman.180918.1215730740.10106.kde-redhat-users () lists ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Send kde-redhat-users mailing list submissions to
	kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	kde-redhat-users-owner@lists.sourceforge.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of kde-redhat-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: kde 4.1 Beta FC8 (Frank Schmitt)
   2. Re: depsolve conflicts in update from F9 ->	unstable (Rex Dieter)
   3. Re: delay in sound events. (Colin J Thomson)
   4. Re: depsolve conflicts in update from F9 ->	unstable (kwhiskerz)
   5. Re: depsolve conflicts in update from F9	->	unstable (Rex Dieter)
   6. Re: depsolve conflicts in update from F9 -> 	unstable (kwhiskerz)
   7. Re: depsolve conflicts in update from F9 ->	unstable (Rex Dieter)
   8. Re: depsolve conflicts in update from F9 ->	unstable (kwhiskerz)

[Attachment #4 (multipart/digest)]


From: Frank Schmitt <ich@frank-schmitt.net>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <200807071935.29193.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
	<48725207.80301@math.unl.edu>
	<1489051.sHZ9EdPnaS@weidenwinde.istari.de>
	<4873BF12.2050303@math.unl.edu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:14:34 +0200
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <m33amj8r6t.fsf@mid.gehheimdienst.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] kde 4.1 Beta FC8
Message: 1

Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu> writes:

> See also
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/KDE4FAQ
>
> Aside:  Any ideas on how to make that FAQ more visible or easier to 
> find?  Depsite it being around for quite awhile, I still find myself 
> pointing it out a lot.  Maybe there is no solution here, but I'm still 
> hopeful.

Put a link in your signature...

-- 
Did you ever realize how much text fits in eighty columns? If you now consider
that a signature usually consists of up to four lines, this gives you enough
space to spread a tremendous amount of information with your messages. So seize
this opportunity and don't waste your signature with bullshit nobody will read.





Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <200807090839.02898.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200807090839.02898.ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:17:05 -0500
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <48751CC1.20208@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] depsolve conflicts in update from F9 ->
	unstable
Message: 2

Neal Becker wrote:
> Just for laughs, thought I'd try it:
> 
> sudo yum --enablerepo=kde-unstable --enablerepo=kde-unstable update
> Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, changelog, fastestmirror, merge-conf, refresh-
>               : packagekit

Yes, all known problems:
1.  kdegraphics-devel conflicts with kde3 equivalents (libkipi-devel, 
libkexiv2-devel libkdcraw-devel)
2.  anything depending on kde-4.0.x's libplasma = missing deps
3.  anything depending on kdepim-3.5.x = missing deps

1.  we'd hope to solve somehow, not sure how yet

2,3: stuff with missing deps, you'll simply need to drop/omit manually 
before upgrading.

3 addendum: almost certainly, kdepim-4.x will be omitted from any 
official F-9 kde-4.1 update, so it will not have these problems.  I 
chose to include kdepim4 in unstable here.  An alternative worth 
exploring is creating some sort of compat kdepim3 pkg, to minimize dep 
breakage, but such a beast does not yet exist.

-- Rex




Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Colin J Thomson <colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "General discussion for kde-redhat users"
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <200807062251.50425.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
	<200807071826.49725.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
	<200807071805.38136.kwhiskerz@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200807071805.38136.kwhiskerz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:47:21 +0100
Reply-To: colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk, General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200807092247.22215.colin@g6avk.demon.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] delay in sound events.
Message: 3

On Tuesday 08 July 2008 01:05:37 kwhiskerz wrote:
> On July 7, 2008 11:26:49 Colin J Thomson wrote:
> > > kde-settings-pulseaudio
> > > asla-plugins-pulseaudio
> > > xine-lib-pulseaudio
> > > gstreamer-plugins-pulse
> >
> > Thanks Rex, yes I did have all the Pulse files.
> >
> > Strange thing is since downloading 4.0.85 (thanks for the packages)
> > things seem a little better with the sound, I'll see how things go during
> > the evening.. or maybe I am imagining it again :)
>
> In 4.0.85, the sound problem persists: when changing windows, the sould is
> either delayed or gets chopped off.

Yes I can confirm this now..

FYI tonight I have been trying to get to the bottom of why Kwin was sucking 
a lot of my CPU. Relevant system details:
Nvidia system using Livna's packages, Desktop effects enabled just recently.

I have found that disabling VSync in System Settings > Desktop > Advanced has 
fixed this and there seems to be a slight improvement in the sound delays and 
far less chopping off of the events. I guess over the next few days I'll be 
sure if it has helped.

Related to heavy CPU usage maybe? perhaps this could help others.

Cheers

Colin
-- 
Fedora 9 (Sulphur)
Registered Linux user number #342953




[Attachment #9 (message/rfc822)]



On July 9, 2008 14:17:05 Rex Dieter wrote:
> addendum: almost certainly, kdepim-4.x will be omitted from any
> official F-9 kde-4.1 update
Shame. Everything seems to be working well, as far as I can tell.

[Attachment #12 (text/html)]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" \
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" \
content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; \
}</style></head><body style=" font-family:'DejaVu Sans'; font-size:10pt; \
font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On July 9, 2008 14:17:05 Rex Dieter wrote:<br> \
&gt; addendum: almost certainly, kdepim-4.x will be omitted from any<br> &gt; \
official F-9 kde-4.1 update<br> Shame. Everything seems to be working well, as far as \
I can tell.</p></body></html>



Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <200807090839.02898.ndbecker2@gmail.com>	<48751CC1.20208@math.unl.edu>
	<200807091846.12830.kwhiskerz@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200807091846.12830.kwhiskerz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:54:20 -0500
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <48755DBC.5090400@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] depsolve conflicts in update from F9
	->	unstable
Message: 5

kwhiskerz wrote:
> On July 9, 2008 14:17:05 Rex Dieter wrote:
>  > addendum: almost certainly, kdepim-4.x will be omitted from any
>  > official F-9 kde-4.1 update
> Shame. Everything seems to be working well, as far as I can tell.

A little, but it's too big of a change in the middle of a release cycle. 
  kdepim3 -> kdepim4 upgrades need much more testing, and that doesn't 
address the issue of introducing broken dependencies (like 
kde-redhat/unstable status quo, where I don't mind doing that from time 
to time).

-- Rex



[Attachment #14 (message/rfc822)]



On July 9, 2008 18:54:20 Rex Dieter wrote:
> kwhiskerz wrote:
> > On July 9, 2008 14:17:05 Rex Dieter wrote:
> >  > addendum: almost certainly, kdepim-4.x will be omitted from any
> >  > official F-9 kde-4.1 update
> >
> > Shame. Everything seems to be working well, as far as I can tell.
>
> A little, but it's too big of a change in the middle of a release cycle.
>   kdepim3 -> kdepim4 upgrades need much more testing, and that doesn't
> address the issue of introducing broken dependencies (like
> kde-redhat/unstable status quo, where I don't mind doing that from time
> to time).
>
So long as we won't be forced to go back to kdepim3. I have no reservations 
about using kde-redhat, but I don't want to be forced to return to any kde3 
apps.

[Attachment #17 (text/html)]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" \
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" \
content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; \
}</style></head><body style=" font-family:'DejaVu Sans'; font-size:10pt; \
font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On July 9, 2008 18:54:20 Rex Dieter wrote:<br> \
&gt; kwhiskerz wrote:<br> &gt; &gt; On July 9, 2008 14:17:05 Rex Dieter wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt;  &gt; addendum: almost certainly, kdepim-4.x will be omitted from any<br>
&gt; &gt;  &gt; official F-9 kde-4.1 update<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Shame. Everything seems to be working well, as far as I can tell.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; A little, but it's too big of a change in the middle of a release cycle.<br>
&gt;   kdepim3 -&gt; kdepim4 upgrades need much more testing, and that doesn't<br>
&gt; address the issue of introducing broken dependencies (like<br>
&gt; kde-redhat/unstable status quo, where I don't mind doing that from time<br>
&gt; to time).<br>
&gt;<br>
So long as we won't be forced to go back to kdepim3. I have no reservations about \
using kde-redhat, but I don't want to be forced to return to any kde3 \
apps.</p></body></html>



Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <200807090839.02898.ndbecker2@gmail.com>	<200807091846.12830.kwhiskerz@gmail.com>	<48755DBC.5090400@math.unl.edu>
  <200807100947.20868.kwhiskerz@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200807100947.20868.kwhiskerz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:45:41 -0500
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <48763CB5.10108@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] depsolve conflicts in update from F9 ->
	unstable
Message: 7

kwhiskerz wrote:
> On July 9, 2008 18:54:20 Rex Dieter wrote:
> > kwhiskerz wrote:
> > > On July 9, 2008 14:17:05 Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > > addendum: almost certainly, kdepim-4.x will be omitted from any
> > > > official F-9 kde-4.1 update
> > > 
> > > Shame. Everything seems to be working well, as far as I can tell.
> > 
> > A little, but it's too big of a change in the middle of a release cycle.
> > kdepim3 -> kdepim4 upgrades need much more testing, and that doesn't
> > address the issue of introducing broken dependencies (like
> > kde-redhat/unstable status quo, where I don't mind doing that from time
> > to time).
> > 
> So long as we won't be forced to go back to kdepim3. I have no 
> reservations about using kde-redhat, but I don't want to be forced to 
> return to any kde3 apps.

Hooked ya, did we?  :)  (I'm in that boat too)

I'll make sure to continue to provide kdepim4 (in at least the unstable 
repo) for those F-9 users who wish to continue to use it.

-- Rex


[Attachment #19 (message/rfc822)]



On July 10, 2008 10:45:41 Rex Dieter wrote:
> I'll make sure to continue to provide kdepim4 (in at least the unstable
> repo) for those F-9 users who wish to continue to use it.
>
Looking forward to it :-)

[Attachment #22 (text/html)]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" \
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" \
content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; \
}</style></head><body style=" font-family:'DejaVu Sans'; font-size:10pt; \
font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On July 10, 2008 10:45:41 Rex Dieter wrote:<br> \
&gt; I'll make sure to continue to provide kdepim4 (in at least the unstable<br> &gt; \
repo) for those F-9 users who wish to continue to use it.<br> &gt;<br>
Looking forward to it :-)</p></body></html>


--===============1785899467==--

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08

_______________________________________________
kde-redhat-users mailing list
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic