'kde-redhat-users Digest, Vol 7, Issue 21'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-redhat-users
Subject:    kde-redhat-users Digest, Vol 7, Issue 21
From:       kde-redhat-users-request () lists ! sourceforge ! net
Date:       2006-12-23 0:00:03
Message-ID: mailman.494.1166832003.5867.kde-redhat-users () lists ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Send kde-redhat-users mailing list submissions to
	kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	kde-redhat-users-owner@lists.sourceforge.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of kde-redhat-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: missing yum headers for CentOS 4.3 stable? (Rex Dieter)
   2. Re: amarok mp3 broken on last update (Eli Wapniarski)
   3. Re: amarok mp3 broken on last update (Rex Dieter)
   4. Re: missing yum headers for CentOS 4.3 stable? (Joe Buehler)
   5. Re: missing yum headers for CentOS 4.3 stable? (Rex Dieter)
   6. Re: Failed to use yum to update on RedHat 9 (Rex Dieter)
   7. Re: amarok mp3 broken on last update (Eli Wapniarski)
   8. Re: amarok mp3 broken on last update (Eli Wapniarski)

[Attachment #4 (multipart/digest)]


Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <loom.20061222T011125-478@post.gmane.org>	<458B2BB3.2090001@math.unl.edu>	<loom.20061222T013358-470@post.gmane.org>	<458B6286.90801@math.unl.edu>
  <loom.20061222T160500-37@post.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20061222T160500-37@post.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 09:17:50 -0600
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <458BF71E.4050002@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] missing yum headers for CentOS 4.3 stable?
Message: 1

Joe Buehler wrote:

> One thing you might want to fix: I ran into a problem with
> liquid-0-0.9.7-3.el4 -- it has a bogus version in it, something like
> "%{epoch}.0.9.7".  

thanks!

-- Rex



Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eli Wapniarski <eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <200612210721.46212.Bob.Cavey@gsfc.nasa.gov>
	<200612221514.24409.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
	<458BDB79.4090305@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <458BDB79.4090305@math.unl.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:04:01 +0200
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200612221804.01838.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok mp3 broken on last update
Message: 2

On Fri December 22 2006 15:19, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > On Fri December 22 2006 14:51, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> >>> On Fri December 22 2006 06:58, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >>>> Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> >>>>> Unfortuneately, akode-extras has gone missing and
> >>>>> kdemultimedia-extras-nonfree cannot be installed without it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Huh?  akode-extras was/still-is @ livna:
> >>>> http://rpm.livna.org/fedora/6/i386/akode-extras-2.0.1-2.lvn6.i386.rpm
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Rex
> >>>
> >>> Yes, it is in the i386 repo. Apt-get can't seem to find it in the
> >>> x86_64 repo.
> >>
> >> That one is there too:
> >> http://rpm.livna.org/fedora/6/x86_64/akode-extras-2.0.1-2.lvn6.x86_64.rp
> >>m
> >>
> >>> And here is the ffmpeg compatibility issue raising its ugly head again.
> >>> akode-extras requires libavformat.so.50.
> >>
> >> Ah, most likely the *real* reason. (:
> >
> > Turns out that ffmpeg provided by freshrpms is newer than that provided
> > by livna. I know, I know use livna. We'll see. :)
>
> Yeah, that pisses me off to no end.  Both livna/freshrpm *know* about
> these incompatibilities, but there's not much movement to actually *do*
> anything about it.
>

Is there anything that you can do about it, or anyone else?

Eli




Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <200612210721.46212.Bob.Cavey@gsfc.nasa.gov>	<200612221514.24409.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>	<458BDB79.4090305@math.unl.edu>
  <200612221804.01838.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <200612221804.01838.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:20:03 -0600
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <458C05B3.3030206@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok mp3 broken on last update
Message: 3

Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> On Fri December 22 2006 15:19, Rex Dieter wrote:

> > > Turns out that ffmpeg provided by freshrpms is newer than that provided
> > > by livna. I know, I know use livna. We'll see. :)
> > Yeah, that pisses me off to no end.  Both livna/freshrpm *know* about
> > these incompatibilities, but there's not much movement to actually *do*
> > anything about it.
> > 
> 
> Is there anything that you can do about it, or anyone else?

Break out some pointy clue-sticks and threaten to use them if folks 
don't fix their sh?@#@t?  (:

-- Rex



Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joe Buehler <aspam@cox.net>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <loom.20061222T011125-478@post.gmane.org>	<458B2BB3.2090001@math.unl.edu>	<loom.20061222T013358-470@post.gmane.org>	<458B6286.90801@math.unl.edu>
  <loom.20061222T160500-37@post.gmane.org>
	<458BF71E.4050002@math.unl.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:40:31 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <loom.20061222T173834-998@post.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] missing yum headers for CentOS 4.3 stable?
Message: 4

here's another problem -- kdenetwork in the CentOS 4.3 kde-redhat
depends on libiw.so.28.  That is not a CentOS 4.3 package,
it's CentOS 4.4.  The proper version appears to be libiw.so.27.

Joe Buehler



Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <loom.20061222T011125-478@post.gmane.org>	<458B2BB3.2090001@math.unl.edu>	 \
<loom.20061222T013358-470@post.gmane.org>	<458B6286.90801@math.unl.edu>	<loom.20061222T160500-37@post.gmane.org>	<458BF71E.4050002@math.unl.edu>
  <loom.20061222T173834-998@post.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20061222T173834-998@post.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:45:10 -0600
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <458C0B96.2030901@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] missing yum headers for CentOS 4.3 stable?
Message: 5

Joe Buehler wrote:
> here's another problem -- kdenetwork in the CentOS 4.3 kde-redhat
> depends on libiw.so.28.  That is not a CentOS 4.3 package,
> it's CentOS 4.4.  The proper version appears to be libiw.so.27.

Sorry 'bout that.  We simply maintain the symlinks for backward 
compatibility.  Fact is, we pretty much only build-against/support the 
latest CentOS release, which is currently CentOS 4.4.

-- Rex



Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <20061221153749.52345.qmail@web15803.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061221153749.52345.qmail@web15803.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:59:42 -0600
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <458C0EFE.6020108@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] Failed to use yum to update on RedHat 9
Message: 6

wei wei wrote:
> Hi guys:
> First all , I strongly need your help, this is ,I
> think, the only possible way to solve my problem,
> I'm using Redhat 9,

First off, we don't support rh9 anymore, but the packages for the
relatively recent release still exist.
See ml thread:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=15829766


> [root@localhost luffy27]# rpm -i
> yum-2.0.4-1.rh.fr.i386.rpm
> [root@localhost luffy27]# rpm -q yum
> yum-2.0.4-1.rh.fr
> [root@localhost luffy27]# rpm -q rpm
> rpm-4.2-0.69
> [root@localhost luffy27]# rpm --import
> http://kde-redhat.sourceforge.net/gpg-pubkey-ff6382fa-3e1ab2ca
> [root@localhost luffy27]#
> 
> Then I try to go to the path /etc/yum.repos.d/ ,but
> under /etc there isn't any directory named
> yum.repos.d, only a file named yum.conf. So I add the
> stuff provided by "kde.repo" which is showed also on
> the kde-redhat.sourceforge.net.

that's a setup for yum-2.1 and newer only.

> [kde]
> name=kde
> mirrorlist=http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/redhat/mirrors-stable
> gpgkey=http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/kde-redhat.RPM-GPG-KEY
> #gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-kde-redhat
> enabled=1

baseurl=http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/redhat/9/i386/stable

should(?) work (better).


> [kde-all]

Drop this section.

-- Rex




Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eli Wapniarski <eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <200612210721.46212.Bob.Cavey@gsfc.nasa.gov>
	<200612221804.01838.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
	<458C05B3.3030206@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <458C05B3.3030206@math.unl.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:02:40 +0200
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200612222102.40978.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok mp3 broken on last update
Message: 7

On Fri December 22 2006 18:20, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > On Fri December 22 2006 15:19, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >>> Turns out that ffmpeg provided by freshrpms is newer than that provided
> >>> by livna. I know, I know use livna. We'll see. :)
> >>
> >> Yeah, that pisses me off to no end.  Both livna/freshrpm *know* about
> >> these incompatibilities, but there's not much movement to actually *do*
> >> anything about it.
> >
> > Is there anything that you can do about it, or anyone else?
>
> Break out some pointy clue-sticks and threaten to use them if folks
> don't fix their sh?@#@t?  (:
>
> -- Rex
>
I guess they gotta be pretty long huh? :)

Eli




Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eli Wapniarski <eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <200612210721.46212.Bob.Cavey@gsfc.nasa.gov>
	<458C05B3.3030206@math.unl.edu>
	<200612222102.40978.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <200612222102.40978.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:06:45 +0200
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200612222106.45944.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] amarok mp3 broken on last update
Message: 8

On Fri December 22 2006 21:02, Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> On Fri December 22 2006 18:20, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > > On Fri December 22 2006 15:19, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > >>> Turns out that ffmpeg provided by freshrpms is newer than that
> > >>> provided by livna. I know, I know use livna. We'll see. :)
> > >>
> > >> Yeah, that pisses me off to no end.  Both livna/freshrpm *know* about
> > >> these incompatibilities, but there's not much movement to actually
> > >> *do* anything about it.
> > >
> > > Is there anything that you can do about it, or anyone else?
> >
> > Break out some pointy clue-sticks and threaten to use them if folks
> > don't fix their sh?@#@t?  (:
> >
> > -- Rex
>
I started rebuilding from SRPMS. A bloody pain in the butt.

Eli



--===============0298703151==--

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

_______________________________________________
kde-redhat-users mailing list
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic