[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-redhat-users
Subject: kde-redhat-users digest, Vol 1 #1207 - 16 msgs
From: kde-redhat-users-request () lists ! sourceforge ! net
Date: 2006-05-04 18:45:11
Message-ID: 20060504184604.0082012C70 () sc8-sf-spam2 ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Send kde-redhat-users mailing list submissions to
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of kde-redhat-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my menus (=?utf-8?q?=C3=98yvind_Stegard?=)
2. Re: Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my menus (=?utf-8?q?=C3=98yvind_Stegard?=)
3. Re: Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my
menus (Rex Dieter)
4. Re: Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my
menus (Rex Dieter)
5. Re: Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my
menus (Rex Dieter)
6. Re: Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my menus (Jose' Matos)
7. is amarok-xine no longer needed? (Tim Wunder)
8. Re: Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my menus (=?utf-8?q?=C3=98yvind_Stegard?=)
9. Re: is amarok-xine no longer needed? (Rex Dieter)
10. Re: is amarok-xine no longer needed? (Tim Wunder)
11. kdelibs-menus (Rex Dieter)
12. Re: kdelibs-menus (Eli Wapniarski)
13. Re: kdelibs-menus (Jose' Matos)
[Attachment #4 (multipart/digest)]
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: =?utf-8?q?Øyvind_Stegard?= <oyvinst@ifi.uio.no>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:26:55 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200605041126.55779.oyvinst@ifi.uio.no>
Subject: [kde-redhat-users] Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my menus
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
Hi,
Concerning the latest kdelibs/kdebase update in testing:
kdelibs-3.5.2-2.1.fc4.kde
kdebase-3.5.2-5.1.fc4.kde
My menus were screwed.. :(. Started fresh with new ~/.config and
~/.local + kbuildsycoca --noincremental, but the layout has changed.
It's more messy; duplicates at different places, the "More
applications ->"-stuff all around (dislike that very much). The
structure is also deeper/more categorized than it used to be. I'm using
redhat-menus. Should I be using kdelibs-menus instead ? I haven't
bothered to follow previous menu discussions, because I've always been
pleased with the menu the way it was.
Øyvind
--
< Øyvind Stegard < oyvinst at ifi uio no >
< http://www.oyvind.nu/
< `Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.'
--__--__--
Message: 2
From: =?utf-8?q?Øyvind_Stegard?= <oyvinst@ifi.uio.no>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:28:09 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <200605041126.55779.oyvinst@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <200605041126.55779.oyvinst@ifi.uio.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200605041128.09205.oyvinst@ifi.uio.no>
Subject: [kde-redhat-users] Re: Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my menus
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
On Thursday 04 May 2006 11:26, Øyvind Stegard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Concerning the latest kdelibs/kdebase update in testing:
> kdelibs-3.5.2-2.1.fc4.kde
> kdebase-3.5.2-5.1.fc4.kde
>
> My menus were screwed.. :(. Started fresh with new ~/.config and
> ~/.local + kbuildsycoca --noincremental, but the layout has changed.
> It's more messy; duplicates at different places, the "More
> applications ->"-stuff all around (dislike that very much). The
> structure is also deeper/more categorized than it used to be. I'm
> using redhat-menus. Should I be using kdelibs-menus instead ? I
> haven't bothered to follow previous menu discussions, because I've
> always been pleased with the menu the way it was.
>
> Øyvind
Sorry, forgot to mention, I'm on FC4, but that is kind of evident from
the versions mentioned above, anyway =).
Øyvind
--
< Øyvind Stegard < oyvinst at ifi uio no >
< http://www.oyvind.nu/
< `Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.'
--__--__--
Message: 3
Message-ID: <4459EE57.9060003@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 07:06:47 -0500
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my
menus
References: <200605041126.55779.oyvinst@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <200605041126.55779.oyvinst@ifi.uio.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
Øyvind Stegard wrote:
> Concerning the latest kdelibs/kdebase update in testing:
> kdelibs-3.5.2-2.1.fc4.kde
> kdebase-3.5.2-5.1.fc4.kde
>
> My menus were screwed.. :(. Started fresh with new ~/.config and
> ~/.local + kbuildsycoca --noincremental, but the layout has changed.
> It's more messy; duplicates at different places, the "More
> applications ->"-stuff all around (dislike that very much). The
> structure is also deeper/more categorized than it used to be. I'm using
> redhat-menus. Should I be using kdelibs-menus instead ?
Actually, there is only *1* menu style now, and that is the *kde* one
(ie, what used to be kde-menus and/or kdelibs-menus). That's what
you're seeing.
> I haven't
> bothered to follow previous menu discussions, because I've always been
> pleased with the menu the way it was.
So, I think you appear to be a minority that preferred redhat's modified
kde menu? (:
In short, we (and redhat/fedora now) are following upstream.
-- Rex
--__--__--
Message: 4
Message-ID: <4459EEDB.6070408@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 07:08:59 -0500
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my
menus
References: <200605041126.55779.oyvinst@ifi.uio.no> <4459EE57.9060003@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4459EE57.9060003@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Øyvind Stegard wrote:
>
> > Concerning the latest kdelibs/kdebase update in testing:
> > kdelibs-3.5.2-2.1.fc4.kde
> > kdebase-3.5.2-5.1.fc4.kde
> >
> > My menus were screwed.. :(. Started fresh with new ~/.config and
> > ~/.local + kbuildsycoca --noincremental, but the layout has changed.
> > It's more messy; duplicates at different places, the "More
> > applications ->"-stuff all around (dislike that very much). The
> > structure is also deeper/more categorized than it used to be. I'm
> > using redhat-menus. Should I be using kdelibs-menus instead ?
>
>
> Actually, there is only *1* menu style now, and that is the *kde* one
> (ie, what used to be kde-menus and/or kdelibs-menus). That's what
> you're seeing.
>
> > I haven't bothered to follow previous menu discussions, because I've
> > always been pleased with the menu the way it was.
>
>
> So, I think you appear to be a minority that preferred redhat's modified
> kde menu? (:
I suppose if there is sufficient demand, I could resurrect the previous
redhat-kde menu style, and make that an optional bit (like how
kde-menus, kdelibs-menus were before).
-- Rex
--__--__--
Message: 5
Message-ID: <4459F04A.7060406@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 07:15:06 -0500
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my
menus
References: <200605041126.55779.oyvinst@ifi.uio.no> <4459EE57.9060003@math.unl.edu> \
<4459EEDB.6070408@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4459EEDB.6070408@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Øyvind Stegard wrote:
> > > I haven't bothered to follow previous menu discussions, because I've
> > > always been pleased with the menu the way it was.
> > So, I think you appear to be a minority that preferred redhat's
> > modified kde menu? (:
> I suppose if there is sufficient demand, I could resurrect the previous
> redhat-kde menu style, and make that an optional bit (like how
> kde-menus, kdelibs-menus were before).
In the meantime, you don't have to wait for me, just grab
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/kdelibs/kde-applications.menu
and do something like
mkdir -p /etc/xdg.d/redhat-kde/menus
cp kde-applications.menu /etc/xdg.d/redhat-kde/menus/applications.menu
then set env var
XDG_CONFIG_DIRS=/etc/xdg.d/redhat-kde; export XDG_CONFIG_DIRS
in a source'd startup script (put it in /etc/profile.d/ or /etc/kde/env)
--
Rex A. Dieter rdieter1@unl.edu
Computer System Administrator http://www.math.unl.edu/~rdieter1/
Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska Lincoln
--__--__--
Message: 6
From: Jose' Matos <jamatos@fc.up.pt>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] Latest kdelibs/kdebase updated goofed up my menus
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 13:16:35 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <200605041126.55779.oyvinst@ifi.uio.no> <4459EE57.9060003@math.unl.edu> \
<4459EEDB.6070408@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4459EEDB.6070408@math.unl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200605041316.35941.jamatos@fc.up.pt>
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
On Thursday 04 May 2006 13:08, Rex Dieter wrote:
> I suppose if there is sufficient demand, I could resurrect the previous
> redhat-kde menu style, and make that an optional bit (like how
> kde-menus, kdelibs-menus were before).
LOL, now that would be ironic. ;-)
It is almost like the nostalgia that some people seem to have to for
BlueCurve. :-)
Clearly this a subject that makes me smile, after so much controversy, with
claims like "RedHat is crippling kde" and others. Like we say here "You can
be arrested for having a dog and you can be arrested for not having a
dog..." :-)
> -- Rex
--
José Abílio
--__--__--
Message: 7
From: Tim Wunder <tim@thewunders.org>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:30:28 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart14172488.7UE6tcRSJK";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200605040830.33855.tim@thewunders.org>
Subject: [kde-redhat-users] is amarok-xine no longer needed?
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
Using FC4, I get this error:
$ sudo yum install amarok
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
...
Parsing package install arguments
Resolving Dependencies
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Package amarok.i386 0:1.3.9-1.fc4 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: amarok = 1.3.8 for package: amarok-visualisation
--> Processing Dependency: amarok = 1.3.8 for package: amarok-xine
--> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes.
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Package amarok-visualisation.i386 0:1.3.9-1.fc4 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: amarok = 1.3.8 for package: amarok-xine
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: amarok = 1.3.8 is needed by package amarok-xine
$ rpm -qi amarok-xine
Name : amarok-xine Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 1.3.8 Vendor: (none)
Release : 1.1.fc4.kde Build Date: Wed 18 Jan 2006
08:59:01 AM EST
Install Date: Sun 22 Jan 2006 10:13:26 PM EST Build Host: mobius.unl.edu
Group : Applications/Multimedia Source RPM:
amarok-1.3.8-1.1.fc4.kde.src.rpm
Size : 137540 License: GPL
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Wed 18 Jan 2006 01:31:40 PM EST, Key ID
efe4780cff6382fa
URL : http://amarok.kde.org
Summary : Xine engine for Amarok
Description :
Amarok can also use the xine engine to decode sound. This package
enables it.
Is amarok-xine no longer needed?
Thanks,
Tim
--
Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz), Linux 2.6.16-tim
KDE: 3.5.2-1.4, xorg-x11-6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2
08:20:04 up 15 days, 22:52, 2 users, load average: 0.09, 0.15, 0.22
MP3/OGG archive Total playlength : 7 days, 21 hours, 46 mins 2 seconds
"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts" John Wooden
[Attachment #7 (application/pgp-signature)]
[Attachment #8 (.)]
On Thursday 04 May 2006 14:08, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
<snip>
> I suppose if there is sufficient demand, I could resurrect the
> previous redhat-kde menu style, and make that an optional bit (like
> how kde-menus, kdelibs-menus were before).
>
> -- Rex
Nah, not for my part, I'll just get used to the new one. After years of
configuring Linux, I've learned to just resign and adapt, sometimes.
After all, humans are supposed to be good at adapting themselves. As
long as I've got all my key bindings, the menu doesn't matter much.
Configuring stuff to death was a hobby of mine years ago, but I got
tired of it ;).
Øyvind
--
< Øyvind Stegard < oyvinst at ifi uio no >
< http://www.oyvind.nu/
< `Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.'
--__--__--
Message: 9
Message-ID: <4459F601.5090409@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 07:39:29 -0500
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] is amarok-xine no longer needed?
References: <200605040830.33855.tim@thewunders.org>
In-Reply-To: <200605040830.33855.tim@thewunders.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users <kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
Tim Wunder wrote:
> Is amarok-xine no longer needed?
amarok-xine is deprecated, use amarok-extras-nonfree (from Livna) now
-- Rex
--__--__--
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 08:54:11 -0400
From: Tim Wunder <tim@thewunders.org>
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] is amarok-xine no longer needed?
In-reply-to: <4459F601.5090409@math.unl.edu>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-id: <200605040854.12656.tim@thewunders.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart2384445.cP3yfVLxea;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <200605040830.33855.tim@thewunders.org>
<4459F601.5090409@math.unl.edu>
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users <kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
On Thursday 04 May 2006 8:39 am, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Tim Wunder wrote:
> > Is amarok-xine no longer needed?
>
> amarok-xine is deprecated, use amarok-extras-nonfree (from Livna) now
>
That appears to have done the trick, but I still have a couple of questions.
During the update, I got an error:
error: %postun(amarok-1.3.8-1.0.fc4.kde.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 2
Is that anything to worry about?
Also, in the Transaction Summary section, yum told me it was going to install
1 package, update 2 and remove 0, yet it removed amarok-xine, shouldn't it
have said that it was going to install 1, upgrade 2 and remove 1?
See the output below:
$ sudo yum install amarok
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
livna 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
...
Dependencies Resolved
=============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=============================================================================
Installing:
amarok-extras-nonfree i386 1.3.9-1.lvn4 livna 94 k
replacing amarok-xine.i386 1.3.8-1.1.fc4.kde
Updating:
amarok i386 1.3.9-1.fc4 extras 9.6 M
Updating for dependencies:
amarok-visualisation i386 1.3.9-1.fc4 extras 22 k
Transaction Summary
=============================================================================
Install 1 Package(s)
Update 2 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total download size: 9.7 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/3): amarok-extras-nonf 100% |=========================| 94 kB 00:00
(2/3): amarok-1.3.9-1.fc4 100% |=========================| 9.6 MB 00:55
(3/3): amarok-visualisati 100% |=========================| 22 kB 00:00
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Test Succeeded
Running Transaction
Updating : amarok ######################### [1/7]
Installing: amarok-extras-nonfree ######################### [2/7]
Updating : amarok-visualisation ######################### [3/7]
Removing : amarok-xine ######################### [4/7]
Cleanup : amarok ######################### [5/7]
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8409: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `<<<'
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8409: line 1: `<<<<<<< amarok.spec'
error: %postun(amarok-1.3.8-1.0.fc4.kde.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 2
Cleanup : amarok ######################### [6/7]
Cleanup : amarok-visualisation ######################### [7/7]
Installed: amarok-extras-nonfree.i386 0:1.3.9-1.lvn4
Updated: amarok.i386 0:1.3.9-1.fc4
Dependency Updated: amarok-visualisation.i386 0:1.3.9-1.fc4
Replaced: amarok-xine.i386 0:1.3.8-1.1.fc4.kde
Complete!
--
Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz), Linux 2.6.16-tim
KDE: 3.5.2-1.4, xorg-x11-6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2
08:40:01 up 15 days, 23:12, 2 users, load average: 0.07, 0.16, 0.23
MP3/OGG archive Total playlength : 7 days, 21 hours, 46 mins 2 seconds
"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts" John Wooden
[Attachment #11 (application/pgp-signature)]
--__--__--
Message: 11
Message-ID: <445A4375.6030309@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 13:09:57 -0500
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <200602042014.44633.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <200602042014.44633.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [kde-redhat-users] kdelibs-menus
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
Alleluia! Eureka! The sky if falling! Hell has frozen over!
Fedora *finally* stopped using kde-applications.menu (and the evil
kdelibs-3.4.0-menu.patch). Yay.
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/178320
-- Rex
--__--__--
Message: 12
From: Eli Wapniarski <eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] kdelibs-menus
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 21:30:10 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <200602042014.44633.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org> \
<445A4375.6030309@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <445A4375.6030309@math.unl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200605042130.11058.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
On Thursday, 4 בMay 2006 21:09, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Alleluia! Eureka! The sky if falling! Hell has frozen over!
>
> Fedora *finally* stopped using kde-applications.menu (and the evil
> kdelibs-3.4.0-menu.patch). Yay.
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/178320
>
>
> -- Rex
>
Congrats Rex. Well done on, after many many years, gettting RH / FC to change
there mind about this specific issue. The context is RH 8. It was an effort
to homogenize the menus so that when a Gnome user or KDE user would click on
the menu, they would see the same thing. I wrote about this way back when and
the feed back I got at the time was essentially, its a great idea. Gnome and
KDE should work exactly the same way.
Once again... very very well done and thank you.
Eli
--__--__--
Message: 13
From: Jose' Matos <jamatos@fc.up.pt>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] kdelibs-menus
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 19:44:12 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <200602042014.44633.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org> \
<445A4375.6030309@math.unl.edu> \
<200605042130.11058.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <200605042130.11058.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200605041944.12213.jamatos@fc.up.pt>
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
On Thursday 04 May 2006 19:30, Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> Once again... very very well done and thank you.
+1
> Eli
--
José Abílio
--__--__----
_______________________________________________
kde-redhat-users mailing list
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
End of kde-redhat-users Digest
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic