--===============1557707159== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_51401_15088880.1222276256757" ------=_Part_51401_15088880.1222276256757 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Thanks for your suggestions. I'm going to talk to kde-edu team. But, as Anne Marie told me in another email, FlashQard is a bit different from Parley. So maybe they can live together! Shahab. On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Jos Poortvliet wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:45 PM, shahab shirazi wrote: > >> Hello everybody! >> I'm Shahab, a new member of this mailing list. >> I'm the developer of FlashQard project: >> http://qt-apps.org/content/show.php/FlashQard?content=80866 >> Obviously this is an educational software to help user to learn things in >> an efficient way using flash cards and Leitner system. Something similar to >> Parley. It is also written by C++ and Qt. >> Although it is under heavy development, but I think, it currently is even >> more advanced than Parley and has more features. >> What I'd like to know is: >> Is there any chance for this FlashQard to be replaced with Parley? >> > You should contact the developers of Parley (who are still working on the > application) on the KDE edu mailinglist. The KDE Edu developers will have to > decide on this. Besides features, there are more conditions for one project > to replace another, especially if both are still under heavy development. To > name one, your project is currently Qt only, so it offers little integration > with KDE (parley offers a plasmoid, to name a very cool thing). Another is > long-term viability - a project with more than one developer has a much > smaller chance of becoming discontinued, so we generally prefer such a > project over another. > > I would suggest looking for integration and cooperation with Parley as a > first option, especially before starting to talk about replacing. I could > imagine the Parley developers wouldn't be happy with that suggestion, and > you need their approval (as team members of the KDE Edu team) for inclusion. > I'm not saying they have such big ego's, but we all like our own work, we're > only human. Maybe a merger between the two projects would/could be the best > option for all! > > grtz > > > > > > > >> >> best regards... >> Shahab >> >> _______________________________________________ >> kde-quality mailing list >> kde-quality@kde.org >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > kde-quality mailing list > kde-quality@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality > > ------=_Part_51401_15088880.1222276256757 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Thanks for your suggestions.
I'm going to talk to kde-edu team. But, as Anne Marie told me in another email, FlashQard is a bit different from Parley. So maybe they can live together!

Shahab.

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Jos Poortvliet <jospoortvliet@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:45 PM, shahab shirazi <shahab.sh.70@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everybody!
I'm Shahab, a new member of this mailing list.
I'm the developer of FlashQard project:
Obviously this is an educational software to help user to learn things in an efficient way using flash cards and Leitner system. Something similar to Parley. It is also written by C++ and Qt.
Although it is under heavy development, but I think, it currently is even more advanced than Parley and has more features.
What I'd like to know is:
Is there any chance for this FlashQard to be replaced with Parley?
You should contact the developers of Parley (who are still working on the application) on the KDE edu mailinglist. The KDE Edu developers will have to decide on this. Besides features, there are more conditions for one project to replace another, especially if both are still under heavy development. To name one, your project is currently Qt only, so it offers little integration with KDE (parley offers a plasmoid, to name a very cool thing). Another is long-term viability - a project with more than one developer has a much smaller chance of becoming discontinued, so we generally prefer such a project over another.

I would suggest looking for integration and cooperation with Parley as a first option, especially before starting to talk about replacing. I could imagine the Parley developers wouldn't be happy with that suggestion, and you need their approval (as team members of the KDE Edu team) for inclusion. I'm not saying they have such big ego's, but we all like our own work, we're only human. Maybe a merger between the two projects would/could be the best option for all!

grtz





 
 
best regards...
Shahab

_______________________________________________
kde-quality mailing list
kde-quality@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality



_______________________________________________
kde-quality mailing list
kde-quality@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality


------=_Part_51401_15088880.1222276256757-- --===============1557707159== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ kde-quality mailing list kde-quality@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality --===============1557707159==--