[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-quality
Subject:    konqueror
From:       frank.osterfeld () gmx ! de (Frank Osterfeld)
Date:       2005-04-18 1:21:08
Message-ID: 200504180121.33211.frank.osterfeld () gmx ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 17 April 2005 14:54, Barry O'Donovan wrote:

> Perhaps there is merit in porting Gecko to KDE but in the end it will
> still look just like Konqueror, not Firefox, as it is a "background
> component" just like KHTML. Personally, I believe that Konqueror is
> fantastic, that the developers have done a sterling job and that they
> should concentrate on improving KHTML rather than getting distracted in
> porting Gecko (*).

> (*) this may actually already be done?? Last years conference?

You might find Zack's recent blog entry interesting:

http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/view/976
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-quality/attachments/20050418/7930cf3c/attachment.pgp

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]