[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-promo
Subject: Re: KDE's presence on Mastodon
From: Martin Klapetek <martin.klapetek () gmail ! com>
Date: 2017-07-04 23:12:29
Message-ID: CAPLgePoRM9w3w2PGF67gtkKbR76SnsSDqPpKGckuB1zEBv_KiA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org> wrote:
> El dimecres, 5 de juliol de 2017, a les 0:51:33 CEST, Paul Brown va
> escriure:
> > On Wednesday, 5 July 2017 00:34:49 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > El dimarts, 4 de juliol de 2017, a les 23:43:22 CEST, Ingo Kl=C3=B6ck=
er va
> > >
> > > escriure:
> > > > On Tuesday 04 July 2017 23:02:47 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > > El dimarts, 4 de juliol de 2017, a les 20:42:10 CEST, Ingo Kl=C3=
=B6cker
> va
> > > > >
> > > > > escriure:
> > > > > > On Tuesday 04 July 2017 20:33:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > > > > El dimarts, 4 de juliol de 2017, a les 8:01:18 CEST, Paul
> Brown va
> > > > > >
> > > > > > escriure:
> > > > > > > > On Monday, 3 July 2017 23:01:49 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrot=
e:
> > > > > > > > > El dilluns, 3 de juliol de 2017, a les 0:46:02 CEST, Paul
> > > > > > > > > Brown va
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > escriure:
> > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, 2 July 2017 18:46:18 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote=
:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, 2 July 2017 09:30:39 CEST Paul Brown wrote=
:
> > > > > > > > > > Ok. Created @kde@mastodon.technology and it is now live=
.
> > > > > > > > > > Please
> > > > > > > > > > follow.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > To start with, we will just be copying over tweets as
> they
> > > > > > > > > > happen. Later we
> > > > > > > > > > will figure out how to properly use this platform.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > As usual, all help and suggestions are welcome.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://community.kde.org/Promo/People/social_media
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I guess it's clear the social-media mailing list is
> useless.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why is it useless?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Because you decided to create all those handles without askin=
g
> > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > or without even announcing it there after the fact.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Albert, I suggest that you take back those accusations.
> > > > >
> > > > > Facts are accusations?
> > > >
> > > > You wrote "Because you decided ...". That's not a fact, that's a
> claim
> > > > (and for me it does actually feel like an accusation) ... unless yo=
u
> > > > read Paul's mind or Paul told you that he indeed actively and
> > > > consciously decided to do what you wrote. You further wrote "to
> create
> > > > all those handles". He created exactly one handle. So, that's yet
> > > > another debatable "fact" unless "all those" actually means "one" to
> you
> > > > It doesn't mean "one" for me.
> > >
> > > "Hey, i only killed one person not many, why are you so upset!"
> > >
> > > Now seriously, i'm not blaming him for having created the account,
> >
> > I am right here.
>
> I don't understand what that sentence means.
>
> >
> > > i'm just
> > > highlighting that maybe the social-media list is not very useful if
> it's
> > > not used for what it is supposed to be used for.
> >
> > You phrased your message poorly, then. I would be more careful in the
> > future.
>
> Please can somebody tell me what's wrongly phrased in
>
> "I guess it's clear the social-media mailing list is useless."
>
> "Because you decided to create all those handles without asking there or
> without even announcing it there after the fact."
>
> For me it is clear the focus on "the list is useless because it's not use=
d"
> not on "you're doing it wrong".
>
> Nowhere in my email thread i said "Paul did things wrong".
>
> So sincerely i don't understand why am I being told to stop attacking
> people
> when i have not written any attack, just described that a list that was
> created to coordinate social-media was not used to coordinate the creatio=
n
> of
> a social-media account and thus the list is probably not that useful.
>
Because you phrased it in a very snarky way when there was/is
no need for that.
This entire thread would make everyone so much happier if
it started with "We also have this social-media mailing list, don't
forget to send the note there". You see how much more positive
and constructive this wording would have been? The way you
phrased it does not, in any way, foster collaboration. The second
email especially sounds like placing a blame ("because you did
this without that"), ie. feels like attacking. I understand it may not
seem like that to you, but sorry it really does read like an attack.
I see this as a repeated pattern against Paul here, please let's
stop that and be supportive and collaborative in these promo
efforts that are really, really, really badly needed for us.
Cheers
--
Martin Klapetek
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 \
at 6:59 PM, Albert Astals Cid <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:aacid@kde.org" \
target="_blank">aacid@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid \
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">El dimecres, 5 de juliol de 2017, a les 0:51:33 \
CEST, Paul Brown va escriure:<br> <div><div class="gmail-h5">> On Wednesday, 5 \
July 2017 00:34:49 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote:<br> > > El dimarts, 4 de \
juliol de 2017, a les 23:43:22 CEST, Ingo Klöcker va<br> > ><br>
> > escriure:<br>
> > > On Tuesday 04 July 2017 23:02:47 Albert Astals Cid wrote:<br>
> > > > El dimarts, 4 de juliol de 2017, a les 20:42:10 CEST, Ingo \
Klöcker va<br> > > > ><br>
> > > > escriure:<br>
> > > > > On Tuesday 04 July 2017 20:33:55 Albert Astals Cid \
wrote:<br> > > > > > > El dimarts, 4 de juliol de 2017, a les \
8:01:18 CEST, Paul Brown va<br> > > > > ><br>
> > > > > escriure:<br>
> > > > > > > On Monday, 3 July 2017 23:01:49 CEST Albert Astals \
Cid wrote:<br> > > > > > > > > El dilluns, 3 de juliol de \
2017, a les 0:46:02 CEST, Paul<br> > > > > > > > > Brown \
va<br> > > > > > ><br>
> > > > > > escriure:<br>
> > > > > > > > > On Sunday, 2 July 2017 18:46:18 CEST \
Kevin Ottens wrote:<br> > > > > > > > > > > Hello,<br>
> > > > > > > > ><br>
> > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, 2 July 2017 09:30:39 \
CEST Paul Brown wrote:<br> > > > > > > > > > Ok. Created \
@kde@mastodon.technology and it is now live.<br> > > > > > > > \
> > Please<br> > > > > > > > > > follow.<br>
> > > > > > > > ><br>
> > > > > > > > > To start with, we will just be copying \
over tweets as they<br> > > > > > > > > > happen. Later \
we<br> > > > > > > > > > will figure out how to properly \
use this platform.<br> > > > > > > > > ><br>
> > > > > > > > > As usual, all help and suggestions are \
welcome.<br> > > > > > > > ><br>
> > > > > > > > <a \
href="https://community.kde.org/Promo/People/social_media" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://community.kde.org/<wbr>Promo/People/social_media</a><br> > \
> > > > > > ><br> > > > > > > > > I \
guess it's clear the social-media mailing list is useless.<br> > > > \
> > > ><br> > > > > > > > Why is it useless?<br>
> > > > > ><br>
> > > > > > Because you decided to create all those handles without \
asking<br> > > > > > > there<br>
> > > > > > or without even announcing it there after the fact.<br>
> > > > ><br>
> > > > > Albert, I suggest that you take back those accusations.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Facts are accusations?<br>
> > ><br>
> > > You wrote "Because you decided ...". That's not a fact, \
that's a claim<br> > > > (and for me it does actually feel like an \
accusation) ... unless you<br> > > > read Paul's mind or Paul told you \
that he indeed actively and<br> > > > consciously decided to do what you \
wrote. You further wrote "to create<br> > > > all those handles". \
He created exactly one handle. So, that's yet<br> > > > another \
debatable "fact" unless "all those" actually means \
"one" to you<br> > > > It doesn't mean "one" for \
me.<br> > ><br>
> > "Hey, i only killed one person not many, why are you so \
upset!"<br> > ><br>
> > Now seriously, i'm not blaming him for having created the account,<br>
><br>
> I am right here.<br>
<br>
</div></div>I don't understand what that sentence means.<br>
<span class="gmail-"><br>
><br>
> > i'm just<br>
> > highlighting that maybe the social-media list is not very useful if \
it's<br> > > not used for what it is supposed to be used for.<br>
><br>
> You phrased your message poorly, then. I would be more careful in the<br>
> future.<br>
<br>
</span>Please can somebody tell me what's wrongly phrased in<br>
<span class="gmail-"><br>
"I guess it's clear the social-media mailing list is useless."<br>
<br>
</span><span class="gmail-">"Because you decided to create all those handles \
without asking there or<br> without even announcing it there after the \
fact."<br> <br>
</span>For me it is clear the focus on "the list is useless because it's not \
used"<br> not on "you're doing it wrong".<br>
<br>
Nowhere in my email thread i said "Paul did things wrong".<br>
<br>
So sincerely i don't understand why am I being told to stop attacking people<br>
when i have not written any attack, just described that a list that was<br>
created to coordinate social-media was not used to coordinate the creation of<br>
a social-media account and thus the list is probably not that \
useful.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Because you phrased it in a very snarky \
way when there was/is</div><div>no need for that.</div><div><br></div><div>This \
entire thread would make everyone so much happier if</div><div>it started with \
"We also have this social-media mailing list, don't</div><div>forget to send \
the note there". You see how much more positive</div><div>and constructive this \
wording would have been? The way you</div><div>phrased it does not, in any way, \
foster collaboration. The second</div><div>email especially sounds like placing a \
blame ("because you did</div><div>this without that"), ie. feels like \
attacking. I understand it may not</div><div>seem like that to you, but sorry it \
really does read like an attack.</div><div><br></div><div>I see this as a repeated \
pattern against Paul here, please let's</div><div>stop that and be supportive and \
collaborative in these promo</div><div>efforts that are really, really, really badly \
needed for us.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div><div><div \
class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><span \
style="color:rgb(102,102,102)">--</span></div><div><span \
style="color:rgb(102,102,102)">Martin Klapetek</span></div><div><span \
style="color:rgb(102,102,102)"><br></span></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic