[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-promo
Subject:    Re: [kde-promo] Plasma Next Naming - Take 2
From:       Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E4=DFlin?= <mgraesslin () kde ! org>
Date:       2014-01-28 8:39:33
Message-ID: 3820694.lPuJIuoOER () martin-desktop
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Monday 27 January 2014 21:45:48 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> 2014-01-27 Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org>:
> > El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 15:05:43, Jos Poortvliet va 
escriure:
> >> I recall seeing -x often as distro-package-versions, so 2014.06.2 might
> >> be
> >> better. Then the fourth packaging of 2014.06.2 will be 2014.06.2-4.
> > 
> > Just after reading the email I also thought that 2014.06.2 looks "more
> > consistent" than 2014.06-2, on the other hand 2014.06.2 may "easily" be
> > confused with a date while 2014.06-2 not so much, so I'm not really sure
> > what I like better :D
> 
> I just want to see this thread to end :P
> 
> so maybe (because indeed distros use -X as their packaging versions):

that distros use -X as their packaging versions doesn't matter. We can use:
2014.06-1
and distros can turn it into:
2014.06-1-2-distro-5

what matters is that the version number increases. And that's still the case.

What we should consider when using such a numbering scheme is that it also 
works with beta releases of Plasma Next. If we kind of stick to what we use 
today it could be.
2014.06-90 for the beta release of Plasma Next with the last stable release 
having been in June 2014.

Cheers
Martin
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on \
or temporarily stop your subscription.



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]