On Monday 26 April 2010, Justin Kirby wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Sunday 25 April 2010, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > A Diumenge, 25 d'abril de 2010, Troy Unrau va escriure: > > > > On 25 April 2010 14:57, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > > Personally i'm only interested if his scripts are made public, > > > > > otherwise there is no way to trust his study. > > > > > > > > Um, wouldn't he be publishing a thesis, ergo peer review? > > > > > > Master thesis != Phd thesis > > > > > > The peer review happening in a master thesis is 0. > > > > Even for papers on conferences or journals, even while they are reviewed, > > only > > the papers themself are reviewed. If they present results from whatever > > experiments, the sources, scripts, tools, etc. don't have to be published > > anywhere, so actually the numbers in such papers cannot be verified. > > Here's more on that: http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/6 > > Wouldn't that be a non-issue in this case though? We're the ones giving > him the original/source data to analyze, correct? But I guess we will not give him the tools/scripts he will use to process them. And it's about these tools, which extract the information from svn/git and produce numbers. Alex _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.