[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-promo
Subject: Re: [kde-promo] Offer to do some stats analysis for KDE
From: Justin Kirby <justin () neomantra ! org>
Date: 2010-04-26 17:34:00
Message-ID: t2v3ba8a281004261034p39da679rb2e3f58f68565970 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Alexander Neundorf <neundorf@kde.org>wrote:
> On Sunday 25 April 2010, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Diumenge, 25 d'abril de 2010, Troy Unrau va escriure:
> > > On 25 April 2010 14:57, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org> wrote:
> > > > Personally i'm only interested if his scripts are made public,
> > > > otherwise there is no way to trust his study.
> > >
> > > Um, wouldn't he be publishing a thesis, ergo peer review?
> >
> > Master thesis != Phd thesis
> >
> > The peer review happening in a master thesis is 0.
>
> Even for papers on conferences or journals, even while they are reviewed,
> only
> the papers themself are reviewed. If they present results from whatever
> experiments, the sources, scripts, tools, etc. don't have to be published
> anywhere, so actually the numbers in such papers cannot be verified.
> Here's more on that: http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/6
>
>
Wouldn't that be a non-issue in this case though? We're the ones giving him
the original/source data to analyze, correct?
-Justin
> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
>
> Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set
> digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
>
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Alexander Neundorf \
<span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:neundorf@kde.org">neundorf@kde.org</a>></span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, \
204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="im">On Sunday 25 \
April 2010, Albert Astals Cid wrote:<br> > A Diumenge, 25 d'abril de 2010, \
Troy Unrau va escriure:<br> > > On 25 April 2010 14:57, Albert Astals Cid \
<<a href="mailto:aacid@kde.org">aacid@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br> > > > \
Personally i'm only interested if his scripts are made public,<br> > > > \
otherwise there is no way to trust his study.<br> > ><br>
> > Um, wouldn't he be publishing a thesis, ergo peer review?<br>
><br>
> Master thesis != Phd thesis<br>
><br>
> The peer review happening in a master thesis is 0.<br>
<br>
</div>Even for papers on conferences or journals, even while they are reviewed, \
only<br> the papers themself are reviewed. If they present results from whatever<br>
experiments, the sources, scripts, tools, etc. don't have to be published<br>
anywhere, so actually the numbers in such papers cannot be verified.<br>
Here's more on that: <a href="http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/6" \
target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/6</a><br> \
<br></blockquote><div> </div><div>Wouldn't that be a non-issue in this case \
though? We're the ones giving him the original/source data to analyze, correct? \
<br><br>-Justin<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px \
solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Alex<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.<br>
<br>
Visit <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo" \
target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo</a> to unsubscribe, \
set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.<br> \
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on \
or temporarily stop your subscription.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic