[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-promo
Subject:    Re: [kde-promo] digiKam digest
From:       Jos Poortvliet <jospoortvliet () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-08-09 14:09:53
Message-ID: 5847e5cf0908090709i65041caei120faf78a3a32ccc () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Mikolaj Machowski<mikmach@wp.pl> wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 August 2009 23:54:35 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Mikolaj Machowski<mikmach@wp.pl> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 05 August 2009 20:32:35 Troy Unrau wrote:
> > > > My best suggestion (without making you a dot editor) would be to write
> > > > the article in html, tar is up with all the required images/etc. and
> > > > send it to one of the editors for posting.  dot-editors@kde.org works
> > > > for communication, but I'm not sure if the list is equipped for file
> > > > attachments of significant size...
> > > > 
> > > > Anyone have better ideas?
> > > 
> > > I'd like to keep DD without as much changes as possible. It already takes
> > > more time than I originally planned :)
> > > 
> > > Issues I see:
> > > 
> > > I. DD consists of three parts:
> > > 
> > > 1. Lead (short summary, list of highlights with several screenshots)
> > > 2. Reports (Bugs/Wishes, diffs from devs maintained NEWS files)
> > > 3. Selected commits
> > > 
> > > I think that posting whole DD on Dot doesn't have much sense. I think
> > > that keeping Commit Digest way is good: Lead on Dot and the rest on
> > > digikam.org. Mainly because Lead is created by hand while the rest is
> > > automatic - easy to split.
> > 
> > Sounds reasonable, but it can be done either way. The part 3 would be
> > too much for the dot anyway, btw - see how Danny did the commit digest
> > - same story. So a summary is just fine.
> 
> Thinking about Danny's digest. On Dot was posted only "strict" Lead.
> Everything what was on Dot fit on main page. There was nothing in extended
> form. Keeping digiKam digest in this more compact form would be even simpler.
> 
> Pro:
> - one chunk to post and paste on Dot
> - no issues with images (everything is on digikam.org side)
> 
> Con:
> -  less actual content on the Dot (is it really a Con?)

It's not. Go ahead if you prefer this! Even more ponies :D

> m.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
> 
> Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on \
> or temporarily stop your subscription. 
 
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on \
or temporarily stop your subscription.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]