[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-policies
Subject:    Re: P2P Networks: Ninth Circuit Rejects Contributory Infringement
From:       Martin =?iso-8859-1?q?K=F6bele?= <martin () mkoebele ! de>
Date:       2004-11-08 22:43:25
Message-ID: 200411082343.32747.martin () mkoebele ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Monday, 8. November 2004 18:40, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Friday 20 August 2004 16:30, Andreas Pour wrote:
> > Since the legality of P2P software has come up from time to time on
> > this list, I would like to report some good news which, just by
> > happenstance ;-), confirms my legal analysis of the situation:
>
> If I understand the ruling correctly it implies that all distributed p2p
> networks would be considered legal. As long as there's no central
> indexing authority, the network is not infringing, right?

this is how I understand it as well.

Martin

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Kde-policies mailing list
Kde-policies@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-policies


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]