-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 30 January 2003 12:20, Karol Szwed wrote:
> On Thursday 30 January 2003 12:21 pm, Dirk Mueller wrote:

> I currently define webpages as 'the contents of kde-www and *.kde.org cvs
> modules', and documentation as 'the kdoc generated docs'.

And the actual user manuals, are of course, to be in future referred to as 
"chopped liver".

> I would suggest that we do not use FDL as the debian project seems to be
> constantly bickering about its 'freeness' as it allows the use of
> 'Invariant Sections' and 'Cover Texts'. The FreeBSD documentation license
> is the best option imho.

It's the license used for all the chopped liver in KDE, we specify no 
invariant sections.  It's written by the FSF.  It's the recommended license 
for Documentation, by the FSF and gnu.org.  Yet Debian say it's not "free" 
enough?  Sheesh.

It's definitely *not* the license I would choose to use, and I think it's very 
difficult to apply to a website in any form. Personally, I would recommend 
one of the very short ones - BSD or X11 license, or the slightly reworded to 
apply to docs instead of sources FreeBSD documentation license.  

Regards,
- -- 
Lauri Watts
KDE Documentation: http://i18n.kde.org/doc/
KDE on FreeBSD: http://freebsd.kde.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+ORP4/gUyA7PWnacRAm3xAJoCc7pdQX/EARt9Zpgf9hH2VsqR6QCaAx7s
zt4hH4fwpeJrG4b1cj2MpYQ=
=Y/JB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Kde-policies mailing list
Kde-policies@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-policies