[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] akonadinext update: entity processing pipelines in resources
From:       Ingo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2015-02-24 21:35:27
Message-ID: 1572610.taRoBuodnM () collossus ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tuesday 24 February 2015 22:27:48 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 December 2014 16:50:41 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> > Everything read-only is easy to parallelize:
> > * various indexers (full text, indexes for efficient lookups of hierarchy
> > etc.)
> > * a hypothetical filter that extracts invitations or attachments from
> > mails
> > * spam-detection etc. could be parallelized if we don't modify the email
> > message (which I think would be a good idea).
> 
> The problem being that most spam-filter applications (spamassassin,
> bogofilter, etc.) do modify the email message by adding their result to the
> message header. Of course, one can also store the result of the spam-filter
> application somewhere else and not modify the email message, but what would
> we gain by this? What we would probably lose is the extreme flexibility of
> KMail's current spam filtering where anybody can tweak the filters created
> by the anti-spam assistants to his needs.

Hmm, I should have read the whole thread. I didn't expect spam-filtering to 
come up again in reply to Milian's mail. Apparently, I was wrong. :/

Sorry, for the noise.


Regards,
Ingo
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]