[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] KContacts, KXMLRPC. Moving forward
From:       "Aaron J. Seigo" <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date:       2014-11-10 17:55:03
Message-ID: 4849743.SCAxidEXyF () serenity
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Monday, November 10, 2014 18.15:43 laurent Montel wrote:
> Le Monday 10 November 2014 17:45:48 Aleix Pol a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > I would like to get permission to have these 2 repositories finally split
> > into separate repositories and have them promoted as KDE Frameworks.

Aleix: Is there any chance that you might be willing to help split all the 
repositories so that it isn't in a half-done state?

Also, we have a PIM dev sprint coming up in 10 days in Munich. The arrangement 
of the repos is one of the topics. In fact, we discussed some of the relevant 
issues in a pre-sprint irc meeting just today. Would it be alright to wait on 
the splitting until after the PIM dev sprint? I don't foresee any significant 
changes in plan, but it would prevent any possible annoyances should ideas / 
decisions come up at the sprint that would affect this split.

> > I'm suggesting to only split those two (by grafting, like we did with most
> > of kde-runtime, kde-workspace and kdelibs)
> 
> We need to keep git history during split.

Agreed; what happened to the workspace repositories was a travesty, 
particularly for files that moved in the process. graft is a neat trick but 
completely unnecessary in these cases. The repositories are not that big and 
keeping history is trivial with git subtree.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]