[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] Regarding threading (in response to http://www.progdan.cz/2013/11/email-threading-in-k
From:       Ingo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2014-01-10 22:28:22
Message-ID: 2872578.9Z1oFF7SnL () thufir ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Thursday 09 January 2014 19:31:31 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 January 2014 00.02:58 Georg C. F. Greve wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> > 
> > Just quickly: I tried this setting for some time now, and it breaks
> > approximately 10-20% of my threads, which is too much for comfort,
> > apparently I talk to too many people with broken mail readers.
> 
> I can confirm that it breaks for me as well quite often. For instance
> if I am part of a thread but don't receive my own responses, the
> subject threading keeps the thread nevertheless together, but the
> perfect/by references threading doesn't.

Hmm. Threading by references should still give the correct result 
because the References header should reference more than one generation 
of parent messages. Therefore, missing messages shouldn't matter.

I'm absolutely sure that it worked this way in the past (i.e. before the 
message list rewrite). I can confirm that it does not seem to work 
anymore. That's definitely a regression.


Regards,
Ingo

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]