[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] Kontact Touch Mail - Usecases
From:       Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze () user-prompt ! com>
Date:       2013-05-25 15:10:34
Message-ID: 2014550.edqgVhkkWE () sonne
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday, 2013-05-19, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Friday 17 May 2013 19:23:11 Michael Bohlender wrote:
> Björn, Kevin, what's your take? Please review the wiki page as well, thanks!

Hi everyone,

Bjoern asked me to do the review because he is very short in time. So here are 
my two cents: 

* You did collect requirements, not use cases. 
* Software shouldn't contain "exotic" function in terms of unnecessary stuff. 
According Kano (and the respective method -> Wikipedia) there are basic 
functions, performance features, excitement stuff, and features that lead to 
rejection. Prioritization includes those features and the amount of work. But 
all core functions (aka basic features) should be available.
* I'd recommend to reorganize the bullets. My proposal can be found at top of 
http://community.kde.org/index.php?title=Plasma/Active/mail (original is below 
<hr>)
* I added some requirements from kmail but don't know how interessting they 
are because of its technological relation (e.g. authentification) -> marked 
with ?
* I would propose to change some priorities. Have a look for "C -> A", for 
instance.

Cheers,
Heiko.
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]