[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] Data loss: kmail2 must not use existing [Folder-xy]
From:       Sven Burmeister <sven.burmeister () gmx ! net>
Date:       2011-12-15 21:38:10
Message-ID: 1459633.k9do5jlxJB () linux-ydd0 ! site
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 21:45:46 schrieb Ingo Kl=F6cker:
> We don't need GUIDs for every item. We only need them for folders.
> Creating GUIDs for folders will hardly result in a performance problem
> and changing the format of an id shouldn't require massive code changes
> either. Of course, it might require an upgrade mechanism.
> =

> The usage of GUIDs is the only sensible solution for external
> references.

I am no expert regarding akonadi. So I'm not sure this covers all kinds of =

resources and interaction with clients. But for email it sounds sensible to=
 me =

since there is no email without folder.

If I understood Volker correctly introducing the communication of a unique =
id =

to identify the database needs a lot of code changes. Your proposal not. So=
 I =

guess that means we have a winner. :-)

Sven
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]