[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    [Kde-pim] Re: Do we need a Beta3?
From:       Adrian von Bidder <avbidder () fortytwo ! ch>
Date:       2010-12-10 15:38:09
Message-ID: 201012101638.17181 () fortytwo ! ch
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Heyho!

On Friday 10 December 2010 16.15:22 Thomas McGuire wrote:
>  [...] because nobody really is managing the work.

Perhaps this is the message that should be public?  KDEPIM does sorely need 
a maintainer (team) who will officially take the blame^Wresponsibility for 
what's going on and have ideas where it could be going [1].  Obviously 
announcing this (and the status "there is currently no release planned until 
this issue is addressed" as a consequence) is not good for publicity, but 
neither is releasing a very buggy package, nor is postponing releases again 
and again.

Yes, I won't step up nor get really involved with the code.  -ENOTIME and 
all this, which obviously means I'm in the glasshouse.  Shoot me.

cheers
-- vbi

[1] And I'm not saying any of the developers currently involved should take 
this on.  If they don't have the time/motivation/..., that's fine.  Freedom 
to hack on software is also freedom not do do stuff.

-- 
Das Leben ist kurz, aber man hat immer Zeit für Höflichkeit.
		-- Ralph Waldo Emerson

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]