[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    [Kde-pim] Re: Do we need a Beta3?
From:       Will Stephenson <wstephenson () kde ! org>
Date:       2010-12-10 11:54:45
Message-ID: 4D021505.5060400 () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 10/12/10 11:27, Andras Mantia wrote:
> Allen Winter wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Should I ask the Release Team to insert a third beta into the release
>> schedule. The current schedule calls for the next tagging on 21 Dec to be
>> a Release Candidate.
>>
>> If desired, I could ask for a 2 week extension of the schedule and we
>> would call the 21 Dec tagging Beta3.
>
> Having an extension for the beta time by itself will not help. If nobody
> fixes bugs, they won't go away. If developers cannot find time to work on
> kdepim, that's fine, but in this case we should consider of not releasing
> kdepim together with 4.6.0. I wish we could, but releasing in its current
> state will do more harm than good, as there are obvious shortcomings both in
> migration (very important!) and daily usage.

Agreed. And I don't know how it will improve because there is no 
communication from whoever is managing the kmail2 work in KDE PIM or at 
KDAB.

Could someone who is qualified to speak for one of the above give a 
statement on where we stand and where we are going for 4.6 so that my 
imagination doesn't run wild?

Will
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]