[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] QgpgME
From:       Frank Osterfeld <frank () kdab ! com>
Date:       2009-10-13 9:08:23
Message-ID: 200910131108.23588.frank () kdab ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 11 October 2009 17:12:08 Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> On Sunday 11 October 2009 12:16:22 Frank Osterfeld wrote:
> > I think there are some cases where gpgme_verify_result_t says both
> >  "signature green" but also has some error set. I ran into a similar case
> >  (untrusted key, iirc), where I didn't know how to interpret the
> >  verification result correctly. You could debug into it until you have
> > the gpgme_verify_result_t, "print" it in gdb and send the output.
> >
> > Frank
> 
> Ok, I tried around a little and it seems that I get correct
>  summary-messages as long as there is an error, like the keys are not
>  available or they are Red, but if the key should be correct it returns
>  None and in
> GpgME::Signature::summary() gpgme_sigsum_t sigsum is also 0.
> 
> So what I wonder is, should I use summary only if there was an error
> (signature.status() == true), because status reports correctly?

That's something to check the gpgme docs for, or if they don't say anything 
about this, ask on their mailing list.

-- 
Frank Osterfeld | frank@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]