[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] Reply to Author != Reply to Author ?
From:       Martin Koller <kollix () aon ! at>
Date:       2009-10-02 20:30:44
Message-ID: 200910022230.49298.kollix () aon ! at
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday 02 October 2009 01:21:03 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> 
> > kmail offers 2 kinds of reply (which we are talking about here):
> >
> > reply - should use whatever the mail tells kmail to use or kmail
> > finds "smart"
> >
> > reply to author - _I_ as the user of kmail command the program to
> > explicitely reply to the author directly, explicitely ignoring what
> > the author wants in a reply-to header.
> 
> The action is named "Reply to Author". It is _not_ named "Reply to 
> From".

I don't think anybody (users, not developers knowing kmails code)
knows the difference.

> Use the context menu of the From address if you want Reply to 
> From.

> Reply to Author behaves exactly as it should behave.

In your view.
I'm using kmail since KDE2, but I've not used the right-mouse option on the
From address a single time. I did not even know it exists (but thanks for the hint).
What does this tell us ?
The right mouse popup option is simply not a user friendly way to achieve what
one expects.
And I'm not sure if another option "reply really to author" ;-) or
"reply to From address" is the best solution.


> > The author can not avoid that I send him directly a mail, as I can
> > simply create a new mail with his address directly given.
> 
> Right. Then please do this if you want to ignore the author's 
> preference. A possible reason for specifying a Reply-to address 
> different from the From address is if you have to use a certain From 
> address for sending messages due to a restrictive policy of your ISP, 
> but you do not want to receive messages at this address because it's 
> too well known to spammers.

Ok, I understand. But therefore we have the "reply to" action, which I assume
is what 99.9% of people are using when replying.

> > So, kmail shall simply follow my command.
> 
> It does follow your command. The problem is that you misinterpret the 
> command. :-p

As said above: the current solution is not obvious.
And I'm not the only one. At least there is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104229
probably also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118609

> But you are lucky! KMail is Free Software. You can make it follow your 
> interpretation of the command if you want to. But you must not force 
> broken behavior on others, so you may not commit your changes.

Very funny, Ingo ...

-- 
Best regards/Schöne Grüße

Martin    ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail 
          /\                        - against microsoft attachments

Geschenkideen, Accessoires, Seifen, Kulinarisches: www.bibibest.at

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]