From kde-pim Fri Feb 06 13:01:52 2009 From: David Faure Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:01:52 +0000 To: kde-pim Subject: Re: [Kde-pim] Review Request: Improvement of QtConcurrent patch for Message-Id: <200902061401.53460.dfaure () kdab ! net> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-pim&m=123392746125396 On Thursday 05 February 2009, Kevin Krammer wrote: > So I am now using a dreaded :) nested event loop in the thread context to wait for the job's destroyed() signal. > Seems to work. Why not just do "delete job" ? Wouldn't this have the exact same effect? -- David Faure, faure@kde.org, dfaure@kdab.net KDE/KOffice developer, Qt consultancy projects Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, Platform-independent software solutions _______________________________________________ KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/