--===============0193287127== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart23918602.urGumrlejY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart23918602.urGumrlejY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 16 August 2008 21:58:51 Allen Winter wrote: > On Saturday 16 August 2008 15:27:19 Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > > On Saturday 16 August 2008 16:49:04 Ingo Kl=C3=B6cker wrote: > > > On Friday 15 August 2008, Thorsten Staerk wrote: > > > > no I don't want to remove pim.kde.org, I suggest making it editable. > > > > Let's move the pages to the wiki and then link from pim.kde.org to > > > > there. > > > > > > I think this makes a lot of sense. Some of the information on Akonadi > > > does already live in techbase so that it can be updated easily. > > > Developers looking for information on kdepim don't want a shiny web > > > page, but out-to-date information. > > > > Yes, this probably makes sense. > > > > > OTOH, I'm not so sure whether moving all of kontact.kde.org to userba= se > > > is a good idea, unless userbase has a really shiny interface. Moving > > > the documentation to userbase is a good idea though. > > > > We could keep kontact.kde.org as shiny portal, but let it link to the > > Wiki for more detailed information. Would be kind of a media break, but > > if it improves the quality of the content we have there, it might be > > worth it. > > I think we have proved over the years that none of us are inclined to keep > kontact.kde.org nor pim.kde.org up-to-date. > > I don't think we can do any worse migrating to wikis. > > Techbase is shiny. So I expect Danimo and Thorsten to make Userbase just > as shiny. > > Summary: Let's move all the content we can to the wikis and leave > the current kontact.kde.org and pim.kde.org for stuff we need to tightly > control (if there is any such info). Eventually, we might be able to put > everything on the wikis and then do url redirects. I fully agree, the current approach didn't work for years, let's try the wi= ki. regards Volker --nextPart23918602.urGumrlejY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIp+QJf5bM1k0S0kcRAi7QAJ9Z4J95PNrjZWFLUsiGGPChk/JLOACgnXrx mGMeXAsX4rg+QV34156ZlIc= =qQHa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart23918602.urGumrlejY-- --===============0193287127== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/ --===============0193287127==--