[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] KDE/kdepim/korganizer
From:       Marijn Kruisselbrink <m.kruisselbrink () student ! tue ! nl>
Date:       2008-03-04 11:00:06
Message-ID: 47CD2BB6.10106 () student ! tue ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]

David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Marc Mutz wrote:
>   
>> On Monday March 3 2008 17:12, Thomas McGuire wrote:
>>     
>>> Are you aware of any BIC commits?
>>>       
>> Come to think of it, I'm not sure
>>
>> - class Attendee : public Person
>> + class Attendee : private Person
>>  {
>> + using Person::email;
>> + using Person::setEmail;
>> + ...
>>
>> is BC on all compilers. Does anyone know? The vtable layout at least shouldn't 
>> change, but some compilers encode access protection in the mangled names, but 
>> I doubt they do that for base classes, too.
>>     
>
> I thought only MSVC encoded access protection into mangled names,
> and we don't have BC requirements for MSVC yet anyway.
>   
Isn't it not even source compatible? From this snippet it appears 
previously you could do stuff like Person* p = new Attendee(..), which 
now no longer is allowed?

Marijn

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]