[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] License change.
From:       Daniel Molkentin <daniel () molkentin ! de>
Date:       2007-06-24 11:39:22
Message-ID: 200706241339.24468.daniel () molkentin ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Am Samstag 23 Juni 2007 schrieb Ingo Klöcker:
> > So I would like to know how to proceed. I see a few options:
> > 1) people agree with the GPL->LGPL requests
> > 2) we lift the LGPL requirement for kdepimlibs
> > 3) we create a kdepimlibs-gpl with gpl libraries
> >
> > Personally I don't need it to be LGPL so I would go for option 2 and
> > let the parties who do require LGPL to worry about needed license
> > changes.
>
> I don't think 1) is an option for the crypto stuff (but you can of
> course ask Marc :-) ). I am very much in favor of 3).

Sorry, but I think this is insane. Creating a module just for the sake of the 
license... What is the deal with relicensing the stuff under LGPL anyway? 
They are libs, and they were always meant to be. Marc, what are your 
objections?

Cheers,
  Daniel

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
kde-pim mailing list
kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
kde-pim home page at http://pim.kde.org/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]