[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] State of the community and websites
From:       Nathan Eckenrode <Nathan () eckenrodehouse ! net>
Date:       2006-10-01 23:31:07
Message-ID: 200610011931.08614.Nathan () eckenrodehouse ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

i would be quite happy to help out with kontact.kde.org, i can code a webpage, 
but not quite capable of working on kontact. As I pretty much live out of 
Kontact, It would be a great joy to help the community.

On Sunday 01 October 2006 19:07, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2006 01:21, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 October 2006 00:01, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> > > 1) Do we really want to keep the "special" blue look? The revised look
> > > would have (soon, once the artists create one) a PIM or Kontact logo in
> > > the upper-right -- see the aKademy site vs. www.kde.org for instance.
> >
> > I have no real objections against moving pim.kde.org to the new look. It
> > still would be nice to make it distinguishable from other sites, so that
> > people know where they are. Nuances of logo usage are hardly adequate for
> > this.
>
> I've done most of this now. It no longer uses our forked menu code in most
> places. I have tightened up the organization somewhat as well. Please
> inform of any broken links or weirdness -- or better yet, fix it (since
> everyone in the "PIM team" has commit privileges on the site).
>
> > > 2) Do we really need the site at all? The point of pim.kde.org was to
> > > contain developer information for PIM and express some of the developer
> >
> > developer.kde.org is already pretty impossible to navigate. Adding KDE
> > PIM stuff there doesn't really help.
>
> Danimo is working on fixing some of the issues with d.k.o along with
> Dominik Haumann. It needs better navigation, sure, but a lot of stuff from
> PIM could - should - be in there.
>
> > I also still think that the community
> > aspect should be separated from the product presentation.
>
> Er .. developer community from applications, you mean? But we did that ages
> ago -- there should be no "about the apps" stuff left (surfable) on
> pim.kde.org. We have kontact.kde.org for that.
>
> > > 3) Do we have any plan to get the user website kontact.kde.org up and
> >
> > We should get it up and running. If there are user who would want to
> > help, great.
>
> I'll take it to kdepim-users. Basically, with the developer base as small
> as it is now we can't really afford to put time into the websites, but we
> can't afford to have broken and stupid sites either (not that kontact.k.o
> is either, but it's also phenomenally non-helpful).

-- 
Nathan D.Eckenrode
www.EckenrodeHouse.net
Nathan@EckenrodeHouse.net
646.942.7669
_______________________________________________
kde-pim mailing list
kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
kde-pim home page at http://pim.kde.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]