[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-pim
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] LDAP search speed
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2005-05-26 15:24:52
Message-ID: 200505261724.54331 () erwin ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Thursday 26 May 2005 06:01, Andreas Gungl wrote:
> Am Montag, 23. Mai 2005 21:00 schrieb Andreas Gungl:
> > Searches in a large amount of address data are quick when composing
> > a message in Mozilla, but slow when using the Mozilla addressbook.
> > Kontact behaves in exactly the opposite way. Searching for a name
> > in KAddressbook (in the KPart as well) is pretty fast. If you type
> > a name into the To field in the composer of KMail, the search is
> > slow.
> >
> > Can anybody tell me about the differences in the LDAP access in
> > both cases in Kontact (i.e. addressbook and mail composer)?
> > IMO it would be good to have the same speed as Mozilla in the
> > composer unless there is an important reason to have a more complex
> > search in Kontact.
>
> It came down to having "givenName" in the query used in the composer
> (but not in the addressbook). After indexing that field on the
> server, Kontact behaves well.
> So I really can't blame Kontact, but perhaps it's worth an FAQ? What
> do you think about it?

Either a FAQ or a general document about LDAP and KDE which could for=20
example also list the LDAP schema which is used by kabc.

Regards,
Ingo

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
kde-pim mailing list
kde-pim@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
kde-pim home page at http://pim.kde.org/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]