On Monday 30 September 2002 16:16, Pimephalis wrote: > On September 30, 2002 02:52 am, Guenter Schwann wrote: > > On Monday 30 September 2002 01:49, Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > > > If there is a iCalendar file which claims to adhere to the > > > standard and KOrganizer doesn't show the information correct, > > > please file a bug report. > > > > This really seems to be (one more) a bug in KOrganizer :-( > > Evolution is makeing the same type of start/end-times. I also had a > > look at the specs. But that didn't help me :-( > > Perhaps it's a problem/feature with Apple's iCal. For those who > haven't looked into this yet, I'll give you an example of the kind of > entry in their .ics (their extension is .ical) file: > > SUMMARY:Remembrance Day > RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYMONTH=11 > DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20021111 > DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20021112 > END:VEVENT > > This is a Canadian holiday which celebrates, on the 11th of November > of each year, the veterans of the first World War. When I import this > calendar into korganizer, remembrance day is recorded on both the > 11th and the 12th (it sees it as a two-day event). I don't think that's a bug in KOrganizer. This use of start and end dates doesn't make any sense. The iCalendar spec says that a DTSTART without a time and without a DTEND is used to specifiy events which doesn't consume any time, like anniversaries. So adding a DTEND does make it consume time and I fail to see why the DTEND shouldn't consume a day like the DTSTART does. Guenter, has this been discussed on the ietf-calendar mailing list, do you know? -- Cornelius Schumacher _______________________________________________ kde-pim mailing list kde-pim@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim kde-pim home page at http://pim.kde.org/