[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    D10920: Install app metadata for plasmoidviewer and plasmaengineexplorer
From:       Friedrich W. H. Kossebau <noreply () phabricator ! kde ! org>
Date:       2018-02-28 21:57:08
Message-ID: 20180228215708.1.EB75447BDEBDCF72 () phabricator ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

kossebau added a comment.


  Thanks for pasting the chat log, that sheds more light onto things :)
  Seems to me the spec author(s?) are not sure themselves what would be the best naming pattern \
(besides rtld namespacing) and are still sorting that out.  Which to me leaves the choice \
between being consistent with existing naming practice (at least in KDE spheres) and going for \
some unclear motivated naming recommendation not yet hard-coded in spec policy. Where I \
personally then would tend to the former, leaving the .desktop suffix.  
  But no hard opinion, leaving the call to the maintainers.
  
  Grepping across KDE's sources with \
https://lxr.kde.org/search?_filestring=&_string=launchable&_casesensitive=1 it seems that \
adding <launchable> needs more advertizing in general. Do I correctly assume that Discover and \
friends already make use of that data bit, so it's valuable to have it set? Would then go and \
add for apps I care a bit :)

REPOSITORY
  R118 Plasma SDK

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D10920

To: kossebau, sebas, mart, broulik
Cc: ngraham, plasma-devel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, \
apol, mart


[Attachment #3 (unknown)]

<table><tr><td style="">kossebau added a comment.
</td><a style="text-decoration: none; padding: 4px 8px; margin: 0 8px 8px; float: right; color: \
#464C5C; font-weight: bold; border-radius: 3px; background-color: #F7F7F9; background-image: \
linear-gradient(to bottom,#fff,#f1f0f1); display: inline-block; border: 1px solid \
rgba(71,87,120,.2);" href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D10920" rel="noreferrer">View \
Revision</a></tr></table><br /><div><div><p>Thanks for pasting the chat log, that sheds more \
light onto things :)<br /> Seems to me the spec author(s?) are not sure themselves what would \
be the best naming pattern (besides rtld namespacing) and are still sorting that out.<br /> \
Which to me leaves the choice between being consistent with existing naming practice (at least \
in KDE spheres) and going for some unclear motivated naming recommendation not yet hard-coded \
in spec policy. Where I personally then would tend to the former, leaving the .desktop \
suffix.</p>

<p>But no hard opinion, leaving the call to the maintainers.</p>

<p>Grepping across KDE&#039;s sources with <a \
href="https://lxr.kde.org/search?_filestring=&amp;_string=launchable&amp;_casesensitive=1" \
class="remarkup-link" target="_blank" \
rel="noreferrer">https://lxr.kde.org/search?_filestring=&amp;_string=launchable&amp;_casesensitive=1</a> \
it seems that adding &lt;launchable&gt; needs more advertizing in general. Do I correctly \
assume that Discover and friends already make use of that data bit, so it&#039;s valuable to \
have it set? Would then go and add for apps I care a bit :)</p></div></div><br \
/><div><strong>REPOSITORY</strong><div><div>R118 Plasma SDK</div></div></div><br \
/><div><strong>REVISION DETAIL</strong><div><a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D10920" \
rel="noreferrer">https://phabricator.kde.org/D10920</a></div></div><br /><div><strong>To: \
</strong>kossebau, sebas, mart, broulik<br /><strong>Cc: </strong>ngraham, plasma-devel, \
ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart<br /></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]