From kde-panel-devel Sun Dec 31 20:14:49 2017 From: Andres Betts Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 20:14:49 +0000 To: kde-panel-devel Subject: D9549: Horizontally center shadows and make them bigger Message-Id: <20171231201448.1.9FDAEB52FEE7A057 () phabricator ! kde ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-panel-devel&m=151475129825637 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--191aa3936f34458c94114051e7e61202" --191aa3936f34458c94114051e7e61202 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ascii" Mime-Version: 1.0 abetts added a comment. In https://phabricator.kde.org/D9549#184487, @hpereiradacosta wrote: > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D9549#184007, @abetts wrote: > > > @hpereiradacosta I feel this is a good direction for the theme. I am sure we can evolve it to fit new ideas. > > > Regarding this (and the comment you made on the other thread), I am restating my oppinion here: > > If it is only "a good direction" then it is not enough sorry. > > I would really like to avoid too many iterations on this topic. Window decoration are very visible to users, so changing it every two releases gives a really bad impression on the quality of the code and of our design. > We should get it as right as possible before pushing to the official repo. > > Andy, if you think the shadow should be improved, please indicate how so that the patch gets fixed before it gets committed. > Devs can work with patches applied to the official code, there is no need to commit for changes to be tested. > > Hugo I mean to say that the shadows are improved with this patch being proposed. I would not change anything. My thought is that in future years we can revisit and think if we need to make any new changes. This is a huge visual improvement in my opinion. I think we should accept the patch. REPOSITORY R31 Breeze BRANCH master REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D9549 To: ngraham, abetts, hpereiradacosta, #vdg, #breeze, alake Cc: zzag, cfeck, januz, rpelorosso, apol, mvourlakos, plasma-devel, ZrenBot, progwolff, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, mart --191aa3936f34458c94114051e7e61202 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="ascii" Mime-Version: 1.0 View Revision=
abetts added a comment.

In D9549#184= 487, @hpereiradacosta wr= ote:

@hpereiradacosta I = feel this is a good direction for the theme. I am sure we can evolve it to = fit new ideas.

Regarding this (and the comment you made on the other thread), I am rest= ating my oppinion here:

If it is only "a good direction" then it is not enough sorry.<= /p>

I would really like to avoid too many iterations on this topic. Window d= ecoration are very visible to users, so changing it every two releases give= s a really bad impression on the quality of the code and of our design. We should get it as right as possible before pushing to the official repo.=

Andy, if you think the shadow should be improved, please indicate how so= that the patch gets fixed before it gets committed.
Devs can work with patches applied to the official code, there is no need = to commit for changes to be tested.

Hugo

I mean to say that the shadows are improved with this patch being propos= ed. I would not change anything. My thought is that in future years we can = revisit and think if we need to make any new changes. This is a huge visual= improvement in my opinion. I think we should accept the patch.


REPOSITORY
R31 Breeze
<= /div>
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
To: ngraham, abetts, hpereiradacosta,= VDG, Breeze, alake
Cc: zzag, cfeck, januz, rpeloross= o, apol, mvourlakos, plasma-devel, ZrenBot, progwolff, lesliezhai, ali-moha= med, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, mart
--191aa3936f34458c94114051e7e61202--