Would it make sense to maybe write it down now?
I wasn't aware of it and it's a good rule. It would be useful both for documentation and to get inspired when new policies are required.

Aleix

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:49 PM, David Edmundson <noreply@phabricator.kde.org> wrote:
davidedmundson created this revision.
Restricted Application added a project: Plasma.
Restricted Application added a subscriber: plasma-devel. 		View Revision

REVISION SUMMARY

Up till this commit we had an unwritten policy:

If it's a shared password (wifi, printer, samba) we can reveal the password
If it's a personal password, you cannot

This commit didn't unify the workspace behaviour, but broke it from what we have
elsewhere user manager and polkit.

It didn't fix anything, but introduced multiple issues.

BUG: 387418
and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487169

Even if we followed a kiosk restriction, I can't use that from SDDM.

This reverts commit 2f9bfbc5e153cf98c33c6eebbf2859a48493f4b9.


REPOSITORY
R120 Plasma Workspace

BRANCH
master


AFFECTED FILES
lookandfeel/contents/lockscreen/MainBlock.qml
sddm-theme/Login.qml

To: davidedmundson
Cc: plasma-devel, ZrenBot, progwolff, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart