From kde-panel-devel Wed Nov 29 11:40:40 2017 From: Aleix Pol Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:40:40 +0000 To: kde-panel-devel Subject: Unwritten design policy Re: D9040: Revert "[Lock Screen / Login] Add "reveal password button"" Message-Id: X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-panel-devel&m=151195568908037 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--001a1145b66a1560e1055f1d9ce9" --001a1145b66a1560e1055f1d9ce9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Would it make sense to maybe write it down now? I wasn't aware of it and it's a good rule. It would be useful both for documentation and to get inspired when new policies are required. Aleix On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:49 PM, David Edmundson < noreply@phabricator.kde.org> wrote: > davidedmundson created this revision. > Restricted Application added a project: Plasma. > Restricted Application added a subscriber: plasma-devel. View Revision > > *REVISION SUMMARY* > > Up till this commit we had an unwritten policy: > > If it's a shared password (wifi, printer, samba) we can reveal the password > If it's a personal password, you cannot > > This commit didn't unify the workspace behaviour, but broke it from what > we have > elsewhere user manager and polkit. > > It didn't fix anything, but introduced multiple issues. > > BUG: 387418 > and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487169 > > Even if we followed a kiosk restriction, I can't use that from SDDM. > > This reverts commit 2f9bfbc5e153cf98c33c6eebbf2859a48493f4b9. > > *REPOSITORY* > R120 Plasma Workspace > > *BRANCH* > master > > *REVISION DETAIL* > https://phabricator.kde.org/D9040 > > *AFFECTED FILES* > lookandfeel/contents/lockscreen/MainBlock.qml > sddm-theme/Login.qml > > *To: *davidedmundson > *Cc: *plasma-devel, ZrenBot, progwolff, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, > jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart > --001a1145b66a1560e1055f1d9ce9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Would it make sense to maybe write it down now?
I wasn= 't aware of it and it's a good rule. It would be useful both for do= cumentation and to get inspired when new policies are required.
Aleix

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:49 PM, David Edmundson <= noreply@ph= abricator.kde.org> wrote:
<= table>davidedmundson created this revision.
Restricted Ap= plication added a project: Plasma.
Restricted Application added a subscr= iber: plasma-devel. View Revision
REVISION SUMMARY

U= p till this commit we had an unwritten policy:

If it's a shared password (wifi, printer, samba) we can reveal the p= assword
If it's a personal password, you cannot

This commit didn't unify the workspace behaviour, but broke it from = what we have
elsewhere user manager and polkit.

It didn't fix anything, but introduced multiple issues.

BUG: 387418
and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1487169

Even if we followed a kiosk restriction, I can't use that from SDDM.=

This reverts commit 2f9bfbc5e153cf98c33c6eebbf2859a48493f4b9.


REPOSITORY
R120 Plasma Workspa= ce

BRANCH
master
<= /div>


AFFECTED FILES=
lookandfeel/contents/lockscreen/MainBlock.qml
sddm-theme/Login.qml

To: davided= mundson
Cc: plasma-devel, ZrenBot, progwolff, lesliezha= i, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart

--001a1145b66a1560e1055f1d9ce9--