[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes
From:       René_J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin () gmail ! com>
Date:       2017-02-02 10:23:42
Message-ID: 3363226.AXX7xox9pe () bola
[Download RAW message or body]

Could this be of any help?
https://www.cloudpipes.com/integrations/phabricator/reviewboard
A paying service, but if the integration allows migration of existing ReviewBoard \
stuff into Phabricator a well-timed 2-month trial (or multiple thereof ;)) might \
suffice?

There's also this:
https://secure.phabricator.com/T3179


On Thursday February 2 2017 22:09:34 Ben Cooksley wrote:

> For those who dismiss decay as an issue - problems with previous
> Reviewboard upgrades not taking cleanly have resulted in some reviews
> being damaged, causing their diffs to become unavailable. These sorts
> of problems do happen.

Yes, I bet they do, and I bet there are ways to prevent them from happening.
Bitrot should not be an issue with the ready availability of ZFS (on Linux or BSD, \
FreeNAS etc) and btrfs, and 

> Reviewboard has a WebAPI which should be usable by anyone interested
> to extract all the information regarding reviews, including their
> comments and the diff itself. This could be used to create a static
> snapshot of each review.

Is it just me or does this convey a suggestion that projects that would like to be \
able to use review procedures the way Francis described better run their own service \
if they want reliability and not have to cope with essentially random transitions \
that discard entire histories?

R


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]