[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    Re: Proposal: kde-libs.org, a repository of contributed libraries
From:       Martin Klapetek <martin.klapetek () gmail ! com>
Date:       2016-05-14 13:27:14
Message-ID: CAPLgePq9irSYHDdCDRrWptTpWdX90+G4ho-g4Pa5+xVzo8+PmA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:14 AM, kdea <k.dea@mail.com> wrote:

> I have uploaded the component to the "Qt Components" section of
> http://qt-apps.org , as you propose. It is available here:
>
>     http://qt-apps.org/content/show.php?content=176013
>
> I think it is better than nothing. But I would prefer a dedicated web, a
> repository of contributed libraries, classified by cathegories:
>
>     Qt 5 C++ libs
>     Qt 5 QML libs
>     Qt 5 C++/QML libs
>     Plasma 5 C++ libs
>     Plasma 5 QML libs
>     etc.
>
> instead of having everything in one or two cathegories and mixed with app
> cathegories.
>

Then make it happen :)

The reality of the matter is that in KDE we wouldn't have
no use for such server as we put all we need into our own
libraries. Plus we all have our hands in more than a handful
of projects.

If you think such server would be a good thing, then go ahead
and create it. Things don't just magically happen, they need
people behind it. And if your idea will appeal to wider audience,
you will attract more people.

That's how great things in open source world get created.

Cheers
-- 
Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 14, 2016 \
at 9:14 AM, kdea <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:k.dea@mail.com" \
target="_blank">k.dea@mail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">I have uploaded the component to the &quot;Qt \
Components&quot; section of<br> <a href="http://qt-apps.org" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">http://qt-apps.org</a> , as you propose. It is available here:<br> \
                <br>
      <a href="http://qt-apps.org/content/show.php?content=176013" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">http://qt-apps.org/content/show.php?content=176013</a><br> <br>
I think it is better than nothing. But I would prefer a dedicated web, a<br>
repository of contributed libraries, classified by cathegories:<br>
<br>
      Qt 5 C++ libs<br>
      Qt 5 QML libs<br>
      Qt 5 C++/QML libs<br>
      Plasma 5 C++ libs<br>
      Plasma 5 QML libs<br>
      etc.<br>
<br>
instead of having everything in one or two cathegories and mixed with app<br>
cathegories.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Then make it happen \
:)</div><div><br></div><div>The reality of the matter is that in KDE we wouldn&#39;t \
have</div><div>no use for such server as we put all we need into our \
own</div><div>libraries. Plus we all have our hands in more than a \
handful</div><div>of projects.</div><div><br></div><div>If you think such server \
would be a good thing, then go ahead</div><div>and create it. Things don&#39;t just \
magically happen, they need</div><div>people behind it. And if your idea will appeal \
to wider audience,</div><div>you will attract more \
people.</div><div><br></div><div>That&#39;s how great things in open source world get \
created.</div><div><br></div></div><div>Cheers</div>-- <br><div \
class="gmail_signature"><div><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)">Martin Klapetek | \
KDE  Developer</span></div></div> </div></div>


[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]