[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-panel-devel
Subject: Re: SDDM KCM In Plasma
From: David Edmundson <david () davidedmundson ! co ! uk>
Date: 2014-09-30 10:35:31
Message-ID: CAGeFrHCK4=3RQMtCyMGGeyzvA28Aqh4SObG0i9UqCebfGWegyg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Marco Martin <notmart@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 September 2014, David Edmundson wrote:
> > - SDDM KCM's is in github
> > - Translations won't work whilst it's in github
> > - I asked if I could move it to plasma
> > - 3/4 main developers have said yes (one not replied). Seems good enough
> > for me.
> >
> > It's probably easier (for the other DEs using SDDM) if I keep it a
> separate
> > repo rather than putting into plasma-desktop with the others. Will this
> be
> > OK?
>
> if the other developers are ok with it, +100
>
> > We're way past feature freeze, plus I probably need to go via review.
> > Should I ignore 5.1?
>
> for 5.1 would still do this weird in-between release, but even if is in
> playground can get the 5.1 branch and all
>
>
That seems like a good idea.
I'll put it in playground, make a 5.1 branch. Then we can move it into
workspace via review in time for 5.2 onwards.
Thanks
> --
> Marco Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep \
30, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Marco Martin <span dir="ltr"><<a \
href="mailto:notmart@gmail.com" target="_blank">notmart@gmail.com</a>></span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Tuesday 30 September 2014, David \
Edmundson wrote:<br> > - SDDM KCM's is in github<br>
> - Translations won't work whilst it's in github<br>
> - I asked if I could move it to plasma<br>
> - 3/4 main developers have said yes (one not replied). Seems good enough<br>
> for me.<br>
><br>
> It's probably easier (for the other DEs using SDDM) if I keep it a \
separate<br> > repo rather than putting into plasma-desktop with the others. Will \
this be<br> > OK?<br>
<br>
</span>if the other developers are ok with it, +100<br>
<span class=""><br>
> We're way past feature freeze, plus I probably need to go via review.<br>
> Should I ignore 5.1?<br>
<br>
</span>for 5.1 would still do this weird in-between release, but even if is in<br>
playground can get the 5.1 branch and all<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font \
color="#888888"><br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That seems like a \
good idea. </div><div>I'll put it in playground, make a 5.1 branch. Then we can \
move it into workspace via review in time for 5.2 \
onwards.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div> </div><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
--<br>
Marco Martin<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div \
class="h5">_______________________________________________<br> Plasma-devel mailing \
list<br> <a href="mailto:Plasma-devel@kde.org">Plasma-devel@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel" \
target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel</a><br> \
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic