[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    Re: RFC - Removing System Bell KCM
From:       Hans Chen <hanswchen () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-05-14 13:28:08
Message-ID: CAFfzviCnu_hWSvm-fNgVxhHo9VLT4_wV9_GVj8rs0yQ5wH6OGA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Marco Martin <notmart@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Monday 12 May 2014, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > I don't think it's something relevant anymore, and I'm not entirely
> > > convinced this code even works.
> >
> > I thought it's still used by the accessibility code. If that's not the
> > case: go, go, go!
>
> yes, good point,should be checked if is used in any ways for accessibility
> reasons.
> i have no objections otherwise, but accessibility is important (controls
> for
> it may even be stuffed in the accessibility kcm if that's the case)


Yes, there's an option in the Accessibility KCM ("Use system bell" under
Bell tab).
I've always found it confusing how there are two ways to enable system bell.

Also, for what it's worth there are people who like the system bell, see
e.g. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177861.
I used to belong to this group since I found the system bell more
responsive in Konsole,
but since then I've grown accustomed to a silent terminal.
If no KDE applications use this feature, I say +1 for removing the KCM (or
maybe stuff it all in the Accessibility KCM?).

Hans

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Marco Martin <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:notmart@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">notmart@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div class="">On Monday 12 May 2014, Martin Gräßlin wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; I don&#39;t think it&#39;s something relevant anymore, and I&#39;m not \
entirely<br> &gt; &gt; convinced this code even works.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I thought it&#39;s still used by the accessibility code. If that&#39;s not \
the<br> &gt; case: go, go, go!<br>
<br>
</div>yes, good point,should be checked if is used in any ways for accessibility<br>
reasons.<br>
i have no objections otherwise, but accessibility is important (controls for<br>
it may even be stuffed in the accessibility kcm if that&#39;s the case)<span \
class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"></font></span></blockquote><div><br>Yes, \
there&#39;s an option in the Accessibility KCM (&quot;Use system bell&quot; under \
Bell tab).<br>

I&#39;ve always found it confusing how there are two ways to enable system \
bell.<br><br>Also, for what it&#39;s worth there are people who like the system bell, \
see e.g. <a href="https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177861">https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177861</a>.<br>


I used to belong to this group since I found the system bell more responsive in \
Konsole,<br>but since then I&#39;ve grown accustomed to a silent terminal.<br>If no \
KDE applications use this feature, I say +1 for removing the KCM (or maybe stuff it \
all in the Accessibility KCM?).<br>

<br>Hans<br></div></div>



_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]