[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    Re: [kde-promo] Plasma Next Naming - Take 2
From:       Michael Jansen <info () michael-jansen ! biz>
Date:       2014-02-01 14:19:57
Message-ID: 1760937.aq4ptl6UBj () gambit
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 28 January 2014 12:06:27 Martin Gr=E4=DFlin wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 January 2014 11:50:34 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Martin Gr=E4=DFlin <mgraesslin@kde.org=
> =

wrote:
> > > What we should consider when using such a numbering scheme is that it
> > > also
> > > works with beta releases of Plasma Next. If we kind of stick to what =
we
> > > use
> > > today it could be.
> > > 2014.06-90 for the beta release of Plasma Next with the last stable
> > > release
> > > having been in June 2014.
> > =

> > How about simply adding "beta1"? Eg. "2014.06-beta1" or "2014.06.rc1"
> > =

> > Plain and simple.
> =

> Is it? It makes everything more difficult as it's alpha-numeric instead of
> just numeric and with such a scheme I would assume that it is the beta for
> June 2014 release. Thus the release 2014.06 would have a smaller version
> number than the beta release.
> =

> 2014.06 < 2014.06-rc3
> 2014.06-0 < 2014.06-rc3
> 2014.06-final < 2014.06-rc3
> =

> etc.
> =

> And as already discussed using the date of the final release in pre-relea=
ses
> is dangerous.

Whatever you guys decide to use. It would be nice if it would be compatible=
 to =


http://semver.org/

This is the only attempt to standardize versions i know of. And remember. I =

said NICE.

Mike

-- =

Michael Jansen
http://michael-jansen.biz
_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]