From kde-panel-devel  Sun Jun 30 20:48:50 2013
From: Ivan =?utf-8?B?xIx1a2nEhw==?= <ivan.cukic () kde ! org>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 20:48:50 +0000
To: kde-panel-devel
Subject: Re: [plasma-framework] /: Revert "Enabling C++11 flags for clang and gcc"
Message-Id: <1526220.8nN3nifQWZ () drako ! erebor>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-panel-devel&m=137262535231274
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============3075965170202839895=="


--===============3075965170202839895==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart27456969.xCavoqRXNY"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"


--nextPart27456969.xCavoqRXNY
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


> > +1 ABI should be the same in both versions (unlike gcc's std::list iirc)
> 
> Just wondering, was this email as "OK, I see where you come from", or was it

I think we should discuss this at Akademy (with Aaron, Martin and Marco as a 
minimal WG).

I'd separate the discussion in three parts that could have different 
decisions:
- non library parts
- library implementation
- library api, undecided

(obv. I'd like the same decision for all of those)

Cheers

-- 
I don't really trust a sane person.
  -- Lyle Alzado

--nextPart27456969.xCavoqRXNY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlHQmbgACgkQTGB93IULb3aJ8ACgs9I5duFx7bzWkPjd5edkQLFD
0O8An0CgtxbDn0W9pE8UoEcxBggS0aw/
=7szy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart27456969.xCavoqRXNY--


--===============3075965170202839895==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

--===============3075965170202839895==--